...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of engineering and applied sciences >Comparison of Maximum Gear-Tooth Operating Bending Stresses Derived from Niemann's Analytical Procedure and the Finite Element Method
【24h】

Comparison of Maximum Gear-Tooth Operating Bending Stresses Derived from Niemann's Analytical Procedure and the Finite Element Method

机译:尼曼分析程序和有限元方法得出的最大齿轮齿工作弯曲应力的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Problem statement: Main purpose of this study was to investigation toothed gear loading problems using the Finite Element Method. Approach: We used Niemann's equations to compare maximum bending stress which was developed at critical gear-tooth flank point during gear meshing, applied for three distinct spur-gear sizes, each having different teeth number, module and power rating. Results: The results emerging after the application of Niemann's equations were compared to the results derived by application of the Finite Element Method (FEM) for the same gear-loading input data. Results were quite satisfactory, since von Mises' equivalent stresses calculated with FEM were of the same order with the results of classical analytical method. Conclusion: Judging from the emerging results, deviation of the two methods, analytical (Niemann's equations) and computational (FEM), referring to maximum bending stress is fairly slight, independently of the applied geometrical and loading data of each gear.
机译:问题陈述:这项研究的主要目的是使用有限元方法调查齿轮的齿轮加载问题。方法:我们使用Niemann方程比较齿轮啮合期间在临界齿轮齿齿面点处产生的最大弯曲应力,该最大弯曲应力适用于三种不同的正齿轮尺寸,每种尺寸具有不同的齿数,模数和额定功率。结果:将应用尼曼方程后出现的结果与通过应用有限元方法(FEM)得出的相同齿轮载荷输入数据的结果进行比较。由于用有限元法计算的冯·米塞斯当量应力与经典分析方法的结果处于同一数量级,因此结果非常令人满意。结论:从新出现的结果来看,两种方法的偏差(分析(尼曼方程)和计算(FEM))相对于最大弯曲应力而言是很小的,与每个齿轮的几何和载荷数据无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号