Social Comparisons and Pro-social Behavior: Testing 'Conditional Cooperation' in a Field Experiment

摘要

Many important activities, such as charitable giving, voting, and paying taxes, are difficult to explain by the narrow self-interest hypothesis. In a large number of laboratory experiments, the self-interest hypothesis was rejected with respect to contributions to public goods (e.g. John O. Ledyard, 199.5). Recent theories on pro-social behavior focus on "conditional cooperation": people are assumed to be more willing to contribute when others contribute. This behavior may be due to various motivational reasons, such as conformity, social norms, or reciprocity. According to the theory of conditional cooperation, higher contribution rates are observed when information is provided that many others contribute, This prediction is not trivial: if peoplebehave according to pure altruism theories (e.g. Charles Clotfelter, 1997), they reduce their own contribution when informed that others are already contributing.