首页> 外文期刊>The American economic review >But Who Will Guard the Guardians?
【24h】

But Who Will Guard the Guardians?

机译:但是谁来守护监护人呢?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In posing the famous question, the Roman author, Juvenal, was suggesting that wives cannot be trusted, and keeping them under guard is not a solution-because the guards cannot be trusted either.rnHalf a millennium or so earlier, Plato, in The Republic, expressed a more optimistic view regarding the guardians or rulers of the city-state, namely that one should be able to trust them to behave properly; that it was absurd to suppose that they should require oversight.rnSocrates, referring to an earlier statement' that "drunkenness is most unbefitting guardians," says: "From intoxication we said that they must abstain. For a guardian is surely the last person in the world to whom it is allowable to get drunk and not know where on earth he is." To which Glaucon, Socrates' interlocutor, replies: "Yes, it would be absurd4 that a guardian should need a guard." Instead of Juvenal's later pessimism, indeed cynicism, Plato-through Glaucon-expresses the optimistic view that one should be able to trust the city's guardians and rulers to behave properly; that they should require oversight is an absurdity.
机译:罗马作家尤文纳尔(Juvenal)提出了一个著名的问题时,提出妻子不能被信任,而对妻子的保护也不是解决办法,因为妻子也不能被信任。大约半个世纪以前,共和国的柏拉图,对于城市国家的监护人或统治者表达了更为乐观的看法,即人们应该能够相信他们的行为正常;苏格拉底在提到较早的声明时说:“醉酒是最不适合的监护人,”苏格拉底说:“从醉酒中我们说他们必须弃权。因为监护人肯定是最后的人。允许喝醉的世界,却不知道他到底在哪里。”苏格拉底的对话者格劳孔回答说:“是的,监护人需要警卫是荒谬的。”柏拉图通过格劳孔(Glaucon)表达了乐观的观点,即人们应该能够信任城市的监护人和统治者的正确行为,而不是少年之后的悲观主义,甚至是愤世嫉俗。他们应该要求监督是荒谬的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The American economic review》 |2008年第3期|577-585|共9页
  • 作者

    Leonid Hurwicz;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:27:45

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号