...
首页> 外文期刊>The American economic review >The Differential Incidence and Severity of Food Insecurity by Racial, Ethnic, and Immigrant Groups over the Great Recession in the United States
【24h】

The Differential Incidence and Severity of Food Insecurity by Racial, Ethnic, and Immigrant Groups over the Great Recession in the United States

机译:在美国大萧条中,种族,族裔和移民群体对粮食不安全状况的差异发生率和严重程度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Perennially, black- and Hispanic-headed households have substantially higher rates of food insecurity (e.g., 21.5 percent and 19.1 percent in 2015, respectively) than white-headed households (10 percent in 2015) in the United States (Coleman-Jensen et al. 2016). Minority groups have received considerable attention from policymakers and academics since they have higher rates of poverty and use public programs at rates greater than the majority populations (e.g., Currie 2003; Jensen 2002; Ratcliffe 2015). Food insecurity is a likely contributing factor to the disadvantage of those groups (Coleman-Jensen et al. 2016; Ratcliffe 2015).Therefore, a better understanding of these groups concerning their exposure to food insecurity and how public programs potentially aid them can suggest ways to orient those public programs to these groups more effectively. Though the literature on food insecurity is extensive (Gundersen, Kreider, and Pepper 2011; Ratcliffe et al. 2011; Wilde and Nord 2005), little research provides a nationally-representative picture of the incidence and severity of food insecurity by households of different races/ethnicities and immigrant status.An exception is Gundersen (2008), who finds that American Indians have higher levels of food insecurity than non-American Indians. Much of this research has focused on the role that the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) has on food insecurity or the effect of food insecurity and SNAP on health outcomes. Typically, researchers use demographic variables as controls where they are not the primary focus of analysis. We give explicit consideration to the demographic differences in exposure to food insecurity. At the same time, most existing studies focus on the incidence of food insecurity with a binary indicator, while the severity of that exposure has been largely ignored (Gundersen 2008; Gundersen, Kreider, and Pepper 2011). As we show below, groups that have a higher incidence of food insecurity do not necessarily have a higher severity of food insecurity.
机译:与美国的白人户主家庭(2015年为10%)相比,黑人和西班牙裔户主家庭常年的粮食不安全率高得多(例如,2015年分别为21.5%和19.1%)(Coleman-Jensen等人) (2016年)。少数群体受到了政策制定者和学者的极大关注,因为他们的贫困率更高,并且使用公共计划的比率高于大多数人口(例如Currie 2003; Jensen 2002; Ratcliffe 2015)。粮食不安全可能是导致这些群体劣势的因素(Coleman-Jensen等人2016; Ratcliffe 2015),因此,对这些群体更好地了解他们面临的粮食不安全状况以及公共计划如何潜在地帮助他们可以提出建议使这些公共计划更有效地面向这些群体。尽管有关粮食不安全的文献很多(Gundersen,Kreider和Pepper 2011; Ratcliffe等人2011; Wilde和Nord 2005),但很少有研究提供全国代表性的图像,说明不同种族家庭的粮食不安全的发生率和严重程度/种族和移民身份。贡德森(Gundersen,2008年)是一个例外,他发现美洲印第安人比非美洲印第安人的粮食不安全程度更高。这项研究大部分集中在补充营养援助计划(SNAP)对粮食不安全的作用或粮食不安全和SNAP对健康结果的影响上。通常,研究人员使用人口统计学变量作为控制,而这些变量并不是分析的主要重点。我们明确考虑了面临粮食不安全状况的人口差异。同时,大多数现有研究都以二元指标关注粮食不安全的发生率,而这种暴露的严重性却被很大程度上忽略了(Gundersen 2008; Gundersen,Kreider和Pepper 2011)。如下我们所示,粮食不安全发生率较高的群体不一定具有更高的粮食不安全程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号