...
首页> 外文期刊>The American economic review >Ownership, Concentration, and Investment
【24h】

Ownership, Concentration, and Investment

机译:所有权,集中度和投资

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We argue that changes in firm governance have contributed to the weakness of corporate investment in recent years. Our initial motivation comes from four trends affecting the US corporate sector during the 2000s:(i) Concentration and profits have increased in most industries (Furman 2015; Grullon, Larkin, and Michaely 2016; Barkai 2017).(ii) Business investment has been weak relative to profitability, funding costs, and market values (Gutierrez and Philippon2017b).(iii) Payout rates of US-incorporated public firms, including buybacks, have increased markedly, as shown in Figure l, panel A.(iv) The fraction of the equity market owned by institutional investors, quasi-indexers in particular, has increased, as shown in Figure 1, panel B.Two main explanations have been proposed for the joint evolution of concentration and investment: intangible capital (Alexander and Eberly2016; Crouzet and Eberly 2018) and increased market power (Gutierrez and Philippon 2017a). These two explanations do not account for the entire investment gap, and we study the role of corporate governance.
机译:我们认为,近年来公司治理的变化导致了公司投资的疲软。我们最初的动机来自于2000年代影响美国公司部门的四个趋势:(i)大多数行业的集中度和利润都在增加(Furman 2015; Grullon,Larkin和Michaely 2016; Barkai 2017)。(ii)商业投资已经相对于盈利能力,融资成本和市场价值而言相对较弱(Gutierrez和Philippon2017b)。(iii)美国注册成立的公众公司的收益率(包括回购)显着增加,如图A所示。(iv)如图1的B栏所示,机构投资者尤其是准指数持有者所拥有的股票市场的数量有所增加。对于集中度和投资的共同演变提出了两个主要解释:无形资本(Alexander和Eberly2016; Crouzet以及Eberly 2018)和更大的市场力量(Gutierrez和Philippon 2017a)。这两种解释不能解决整个投资缺口,因此我们研究了公司治理的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号