首页> 外文期刊>Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation >Reflections on Untethered Philosophy, Settlements, and Nondisclosure Agreements
【24h】

Reflections on Untethered Philosophy, Settlements, and Nondisclosure Agreements

机译:对不受限制的哲学,定居点和非歧视协议的思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

During the innocent '80s and '90s, when the alternative dispute resolution movement was younger, and I was too, I read some, though surely not all, of the articles opposing the ADR movement for its encouragement of settlements via court-based, community, and private dispute resolution processes (mainly mediation). The most notable of these was Prof. Owen Fiss's Against Settlement, 93 Yale L.J. 1073 (1983-1984) (available at https://bit. ly/20CJupg). It decries the ADR movement's impact on the public, the justice system, the polity, and sometimes the litigants.
机译:在Innocent'80年代和90年代,当替代争议解决运动更年轻时,我也是,我也读了一些,虽然肯定并非所有人,但通过法院为基础的社区鼓励解决ADR运动的文章,私人争议解决程序(主要是调解)。这些最值得注意的是欧文·福斯的抵御和解,93耶鲁L.J.1073(1983-1984)(在HTTPS://位提供。LY / 20CJUPG)。它减少了ADR运动对公众,司法系统,政治,有时是诉讼当事人的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号