【24h】

ADR Brief

机译:ADR信

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In recent months, several federal judges have expressed concerns about the fairness of arbitration as an alternative to litigation in U.S. courts. In his opinion in Cellinfo LLC v. American Tower Corp., No. 18-11250-WGY (D. Mass. Dec. 19) (available at http://bit.ly/2txZpLg), Massachusetts U.S. District Court Judge William G. Young took the opportunity to speak directly to readers on this topic in colorful dictum, ending his opinion with a section titled "Whatever Were They Thinking? Myths and Realities Concerning Courts and Arbitration."
机译:最近几个月,若干联邦法官对仲裁公平表示关切,作为美国法院诉讼的替代方案。在他在Cellinfo LLC诉中美国塔公司第18-11250-Wgy(D. Mass.Cen.120)(可在http://bit.ly/2txzplg,Massachusetts美国地区法院法官威廉省。年轻人借此机会直接与读者谈论在五颜六色的Dictum上的读者,他的意见与标题为“他们认为的任何思考?关于法院和仲裁的神话和现实”的一段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号