【24h】

ADR Brief

机译:ADR信

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In recent months, several federal judges have expressed concerns about the fairness of arbitration as an alternative to litigation in U.S. courts. In his opinion in Cellinfo LLC v. American Tower Corp., No. 18-11250-WGY (D. Mass. Dec. 19) (available at http://bit.ly/2txZpLg), Massachusetts U.S. District Court Judge William G. Young took the opportunity to speak directly to readers on this topic in colorful dictum, ending his opinion with a section titled "Whatever Were They Thinking? Myths and Realities Concerning Courts and Arbitration."
机译:最近几个月,几位联邦法官对仲裁在美国法院作为诉讼替代方式的公平性表示关注。他在马萨诸塞州美国地方法院法官William G在Cellinfo LLC诉American Tower Corp.,第18-11250-WGY号(D. Mass。,12月19日)(可在http://bit.ly/2txZpLg上获得)中认为Young借此机会以丰富多彩的格言直接与读者对话,并以“他们在想什么?法院和仲裁的神话与现实”这一节结束了他的意见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号