首页> 外文期刊>Air Traffic Control Quarterly >Performance Evaluation of SARDA: An Individual Aircraft-based Advisory Concept for Surface Management
【24h】

Performance Evaluation of SARDA: An Individual Aircraft-based Advisory Concept for Surface Management

机译:SARDA的性能评估:基于飞机的个体地面管理咨询概念

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Surface operations at airports in the US are based on tactical operations, where departure aircraft primarily queue up and wait at the departure runways. NASA's Spot And Runway Departure Advisor (SARDA) tool was developed to address these inefficiencies through air traffic control tower advisories. The SARDA system is being updated to include collaborative gate-hold, either tactically or strategically. This paper presents the results of the human-in-the-loop evaluation of the tactical gate-hold version of SARDA in a 360° simulated tower setting. The simulations were conducted for the east side of the Dallas/Fort Worth airport. The new system provides gate-hold, ground controller and local controller advisories based on a single scheduler. Simulations were conducted with SARDA on and off, the off case reflecting current day operations with no gate-hold. Scenarios based on medium (1.2× current levels) and heavy (1.5× current levels) traffic were explored. Data collected from the simulation were analyzed for runway usage, runway queue size, delay for departures and arrivals, and fuel consumption. Further, traffic management initiatives were introduced for a subset of the aircraft. Results indicated that runway usage did not change with the use of SARDA, i.e., there was no loss in runway throughput as compared to baseline. At the same time, runway queue size did not exceed seven aircraft under SARDA, compared to a maximum of sixteen in the baseline. Taxiing delay was significantly reduced with the use of advisory by 45% in medium scenarios and 60% in heavy. Observed gate-holds were less than 15 minutes in all but one scenario, and even in this scenario 95% of the aircraft had a gate-hold of less than 15 minutes. Arrival delay was unaffected by the use of advisory. Total fuel consumption was also reduced by 23% in medium traffic and 33% in heavy traffic. TMI compliance appeared unaffected by the advisory.
机译:美国机场的水面作战以战术作战为基础,在这种作战中,起降飞机主要排成一行并在起降跑道上等待。 NASA的现货和跑道离场顾问(SARDA)工具旨在通过空中交通管制塔台咨询解决这些低效率问题。 SARDA系统正在更新,包括战术上或战略上的协作关卡。本文介绍了在360°模拟塔楼环境中对SARDA战术守门版本进行人为评估的结果。模拟是在达拉斯/沃思堡机场的东侧进行的。新系统基于单个调度程序提供门控,地面控制器和本地控制器咨询。在打开和关闭SARDA的情况下进行了仿真,关闭情况反映了当前的日常操作,没有关门的情况。探索了基于中等流量(1.2倍当前水平)和繁忙流量(1.5倍当前水平)的场景。分析了从模拟中收集的数据,以了解跑道使用情况,跑道队列大小,起飞和到达的延迟以及燃油消耗。此外,针对飞机的一部分引入了交通管理措施。结果表明,跑道使用率不会因使用SARDA而改变,即与基线相比,跑道吞吐量没有损失。同时,根据SARDA,跑道队列的大小不超过7架飞机,而基线中最多为16架。在中等情况下使用咨询服务,在重型情况下使用咨询服务,可使滑行延迟显着减少45%。除了一种情况外,在所有情况下观察到的闸门时间均少于15分钟,即使在这种情况下,仍有95%的飞机的闸门时间少于15分钟。到达延迟不受咨询的影响。中型客车的总油耗也降低了23%,大客车的总油耗降低了33%。 TMI合规性似乎不受此通报影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Air Traffic Control Quarterly》 |2014年第3期|195-221|共27页
  • 作者单位

    NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA;

    University of California, Santa Cruz, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA;

    University of California, Santa Cruz, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA;

    University of California, Santa Cruz, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA;

    NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA;

    NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:27:10

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号