首页> 外文期刊>Aerospace Power Journal >Not with Impunity: Assessing US Policy for Retaliating to a Chemical or Biological Attack
【24h】

Not with Impunity: Assessing US Policy for Retaliating to a Chemical or Biological Attack

机译:不能有罪不罚:评估美国对化学或生物攻击的报复政策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Devastation, annihilation, obliteration―these wards convey how US leaders would deal with enemies who use chemical/biological weapons against either the homeland or US troops and personnel abroad. The author argues that such words provide diplomatic flexibility but insufficient structure for developing a credible strategy for retaliation should the unthinkable occur. Rather than imply that the US reaction would include nuclear weapons, Colonel Conley offers four variables (context, adversary class, number/types of casualties, and identification of perpetrators) that serve as a decision matrix to determine the type of response to what some analysts see as an inevitable chemical/biological attack on the United States.
机译:这些破坏,歼灭,ob灭-这些病房传达了美国领导人如何对付使用化学/生物武器对付本国或美军和海外人员的敌人。作者认为,这样的措词提供了外交上的灵活性,但结构不足,无法在无法想象的情况下制定可靠的报复策略。康利上校并没有暗示美国的反应将包括核武器,而是提供了四个变量(背景,敌手级别,伤亡人数/类型以及肇事者的身份)作为决定矩阵,以确定对某些分析人员的反应类型被视为对美国的不可避免的化学/生物攻击。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号