...
首页> 外文期刊>Air Pollution Consultant >Citizen Suit Alleging PSD Permitting Violations Is Not Barred By Statute of Limitations
【24h】

Citizen Suit Alleging PSD Permitting Violations Is Not Barred By Statute of Limitations

机译:指控PSD允许违反的公民诉讼不受时效法规的禁止

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In a recent decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (Sixth Circuit Court) ruled that a citizen suit alleging failure to obtain a prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) permit in 1988 is not barred by the statute of limitations (National Parks Conservation Association v. Tennessee Valley Authority, No. 05-6329 [6th Cir. March 2, 2007]). The National Parks Conservation Association and others brought suit against the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) under the CAA citizen suit provisions alleging that TVA had failed to obtain a PSD permit and install best available control technology (BACT) when modifications were made to the Bull Run power plant in 1988. TVA argued that the suit was barred by the statute of limitations. However, the court ruled that the suit could proceed because failure to apply BACT and implement the emission limitations of a PSD permit are violations that recur each day the Bull Run plant operates.
机译:在最近的一项决定中,美国第六巡回上诉法院(第六巡回法院)裁定,一名公民提起诉讼,声称未在1988年获得预防严重恶化(PSD)的许可,不受时效法令的限制(国家公园保护协会诉田纳西河谷管理局,第05-6329号案[2007年3月2日,第六届]。国家公园保护协会和其他机构根据CAA公民诉讼条款对田纳西河谷管理局(TVA)提起诉讼,指控TVA在对公牛场进行修改时未能获得PSD许可并安装最佳的可用控制技术(BACT)。 1988年美国电厂。TVA认为该诉讼受到时效法规的禁止。但是,法院裁定可以提起诉讼,因为不适用BACT以及未执行PSD许可的排放限制是违反规定,这种违法行为在Bull Bull工厂每天运行时都会发生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号