首页> 外文期刊>AIPLA quarterly journal >COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AND THE SCIENCE OF MUSIC MEMORY: APPLYING COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY TO THE SUBSTANTIAL SIMILARITY TEST
【24h】

COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AND THE SCIENCE OF MUSIC MEMORY: APPLYING COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY TO THE SUBSTANTIAL SIMILARITY TEST

机译:版权侵权与音乐记忆科学:将认知心理学应用于实质相似度测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Under United States Copyright Law, an owner of a copyright may bring an action when his or her work has been unlawfully copied. In order to prevail in such an action, the owner must prove that the defendant copied his or her work and that the degree of copying was enough to make the works substantially similar to one another. This concept of substantial similarity remains largely undefined and is left entirely to the fact finder to determine. The test for determining whether or not improper appropriation has occurred is vague and difficult for juries to properly apply. When considering whether a songwriter has improperly appropriated the song of another, fact finders currently assess "substantial similarity" by looking at the entirety of each song at issue and then doing a song-by-song comparison instead of breaking the songs down into elements to determine similarities.
机译:根据美国版权法,版权所有者可以在其作品被非法复制后提起诉讼。为了胜诉,所有人必须证明被告复制了他或她的作品,并且复制的程度足以使作品彼此实质相似。实质相似性的概念在很大程度上仍未定义,完全留给事实发现者确定。判断是否发生不当拨款的标准对于陪审团来说是含糊且难以适用的。在考虑一位词曲作者是否不适当地盗用了另一首歌时,事实发现者目前正在评估“实质相似性”,方法是查看每首有争议的歌曲的整体,然后进行逐首歌曲的比较,而不是将这些歌曲分解为各种元素确定相似性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《AIPLA quarterly journal》 |2017年第2期|319-349|共31页
  • 作者

    Isabel Corngold;

  • 作者单位

    George Washington University Law School;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号