首页> 外文期刊>AIAA Journal >Combining Shaping and Flow Control for Aerodynamic Optimization
【24h】

Combining Shaping and Flow Control for Aerodynamic Optimization

机译:成形与流量控制相结合的空气动力学优化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Shape optimization and flow control have been extensively studied in the past to improve the performance of wings and blades. However, they are commonly applied as two separate disciplines, with their interactions being rarely studied. The present work aims to examine and identify the potential to explore the interactions between the two disciplines and is chiefly concerned about two related issues: 1) how much more performance improvement can be obtained by combining the shape optimization with the flow control optimization, and 2) the effects of the sequencing of the disciplines when the optimizations are combined. To address these issues, five optimization approaches have been studied, representing the shaping only, the flow control optimization only, and three different sequencings of the disciplines in the combined optimizations. All the optimization approaches are applied consistently by using the same optimization system developed in this research. The system uses the Kriging surrogate method as the optimization algorithm, and it incorporates a standard computational fluid dynamics solver for which the validity and numerical sensitivities have been assessed. The developed methodology is applied to two optimization cases of practical interest: a compressor blade and a circulation controlled airfoil. The results of both cases show that, when shaping and flow control optimizations are combined, the performance enhancement is considerably higher than when the two disciplines are applied separately. Furthermore, in the combined optimizations for the airfoil, it is observed that the concurrent optimization leads to the highest performance, whereas the sequential optimizations tend to be stuck at less optimal solutions.
机译:过去已经对形状优化和流控制进行了广泛的研究,以提高机翼和叶片的性能。但是,它们通常作为两个独立的学科应用,很少研究它们之间的相互作用。当前的工作旨在检查和确定探索这两个学科之间的相互作用的潜力,并且主要关注两个相关问题:1)通过将形状优化与流控制优化相结合可以获得更多的性能改进,以及2 )优化组合在一起时各学科顺序的影响。为了解决这些问题,已经研究了五种优化方法,这些方法仅表示成形,仅进行流控制优化,以及组合优化中各学科的三种不同顺序。通过使用本研究中开发的相同优化系统,所有优化方法均得到一致应用。该系统使用Kriging替代方法作为优化算法,并结合了标准的计算流体动力学求解器,并对其有效性和数值敏感性进行了评估。所开发的方法应用于实际感兴趣的两个优化案例:压缩机叶片和循环控制的机翼。两种情况的结果均表明,将形状优化和流控制优化相结合时,性能增强明显高于分别应用这两种方法时的性能增强。此外,在机翼的组合优化中,可以观察到并发优化导致了最高的性能,而顺序优化则倾向于停留在次优的解决方案上。

著录项

  • 来源
    《AIAA Journal》 |2015年第4期|888-901|共14页
  • 作者

    Zhang M.; He L.;

  • 作者单位

    Univ Oxford, Dept Engn Sci, Oxford OX1 3PJ, England;

    Univ Oxford, Dept Engn Sci, Computat Aerothermal Engn, Oxford OX1 3PJ, England;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号