首页> 外文期刊>AIAA Journal >Wall-Modeled Large-Eddy Simulation of a High Reynolds Number Separating and Reattaching Flow
【24h】

Wall-Modeled Large-Eddy Simulation of a High Reynolds Number Separating and Reattaching Flow

机译:高雷诺数分离和再附着流的壁式大涡模拟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The performance of two wall models based on Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes is compared in large-eddy simulation of a high Reynolds number separating and reattaching flow over the NASA wall-mounted hump. Wall modeling significantly improves flow prediction on a coarse grid where the large-eddy simulation with the no-slip wall boundary condition fails. Low-order statistics from the wall-modeled large-eddy simulation are in good agreement with the experiment. Wall-pressure fluctuations from the resolved-scale solution are in good agreement with the experiment, whereas wall shear-stress fluctuations modeled entirely through the wall models appear to be significantly underpredicted. Although the two wall models produce comparable results in the upstream attached flow region, the nonequilibrium wall model outperforms the equilibrium wall model in the separation bubble and recovery region where the key assumptions in the equilibrium model are shown to be invalid.
机译:在对美国国家航空航天局(NASA)壁挂式驼峰进行高雷诺数分离和重新附着流动的大涡模拟中,比较了基于雷诺平均Navier-Stokes的两种壁模型的性能。壁面建模显着改善了粗网格上的流动预测,在该网格上,具有防滑壁边界条件的大涡模拟失败。壁面建模的大涡模拟的低阶统计与实验吻合良好。来自解析尺度解的壁压力波动与实验很好地吻合,而完全通过壁模型建模的壁切应力波动似乎被严重低估了。尽管这两个壁模型在上游附着流动区域产生了可比的结果,但非平衡壁模型在分离泡和回收区域中的平衡壁模型要优于平衡壁模型,在该模型中,平衡模型中的关键假设被证明是无效的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《AIAA Journal》 |2017年第11期|3709-3721|共13页
  • 作者

    Park George Ilhwan;

  • 作者单位

    Stanford Univ, Ctr Turbulence Res, Stanford, CA 94305 USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号