首页> 外文期刊>AI & society >Rethinking 'IT/IS use in a technological mature society' from the actuality point of view: critical learning in reflection on SSM meeting about 'IT/IS use'
【24h】

Rethinking 'IT/IS use in a technological mature society' from the actuality point of view: critical learning in reflection on SSM meeting about 'IT/IS use'

机译:从现实的角度重新思考“技术成熟社会中的IT / IS使用”:反思SSM会议有关“ IT / IS使用”的批判性学习

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The history of the human-centered system movement (Gill in AI Soc 10(2), 1996) tells us that information technology (referred to as IT below) has come to dominate our life-world or societal functions. Since from 1990s, its streaming influence could be called 'abnormal.' Since entering the twenty-first century, the IT system has been on automatic acceleration and has been spreading more and more rapidly to many facets of our lives. In many sectors, this ubiquitous streaming of IT is seen to be central to societal development, and in a Japanese sense, IT could be seen as a resource to realizing technologically a mature society. This trend of IT seems to be unstoppable. In this sense, IT dominance can be regarded as abnormal to the point that IT-centered information systems (referred to as IS below) fall far short of the deep appreciation of the complex and diverse life needs of people and societies, and this leads to the implementation of IT/IS from technological perspective, with a belief that everything, which we can do could be and should be, done now by IT/IS. However, as IT/IS have become to be embedded in many facets of societies and are influencing over our everyday life, we need to examine them not from the point of 'capability' but 'allowability,' in other words, not from the perspective of technology (cognition), but from the prospective of intuition and feeling of actual life (action). We term reality as seen in the narrow sense of cognition and actuality as seen in terms of action (Uchiyama in Theory and practice of actuality, Daito Bunka University, Tokyo, 2003). We draw a distinction between the two classes of 'IT/IS' systems, those which belong to the 'reality' and those which belong to the 'actuality.' To appreciate this distinction, we propose that this requires not only an understanding of the design of these IT systems but of the methodology of their use and their evaluation. To carry out the process of evaluation of IT/IS systems, we need to develop a new 'appreciation' methodology which enables us to rethink 'IT/IS' as 'A system to use IT/IS.' This idea is similar to the idea of Beck's (World risk society theory (trans: Shimamura K), Chikuma Scholastic Collection (in Japanese), 2010) reflecting the modern. So, we propose a strict distinction between the two systems classes of 'IT/IS' which we call belonging to the 'reality' and 'A system to use IT/IS' which we call belonging to the 'actuality.' The methodology to deal with 'actuality' has not yet been developed, but Checkland and Poulter's (Learning for action, Wiley, New York, 2006) soft systems methodology (referred to as SSM below) intends to deal with this kind of class of systems, that is, 'human activity systems.' He uses the key concept of 'accommodation' which means 'to live with different individual world views based on sharing of actuality,' and thus, he proposes to overcome the idea of consensus which is the agreement with the 'reality' level. In this paper, we adopt a methodology based on the SSM's accommodation and not based on the consensus on the 'reality' level. By using such a methodological thinking, we reconsider the problem of evolving technologically a mature society which can be seen as a problem relevant to 'A system using IT/IS' rather than the problem of IT/IS itself. In doing so, we could draw some innovative orientations in the field of IT/IS which by traditional methodology could not be drawn. It is not certain whether our attempt could make a difference to the runaway of IT/IS. We illustrate this purpose by studying a workshop process which highlights that even participating experts ol IT/IS themselves felt apprehensive about the more and more focus on the implementation of IT/IS solutions both in the present and the future. We believe that the first step toward this purpose is to explore the new orientation of IT/IS use. The aim of this first step is to make a difference to the "abnormal' situation and hope to create a foothold for the reorientalion of A system to use IT/IS.
机译:以人为中心的系统运动的历史(Gill in AI Soc 10(2),1996)告诉我们,信息技术(以下简称为IT)已成为我们生活世界或社会功能的主导。从1990年代开始,它的流动影响就可以被称为“异常”。自进入二十一世纪以来,IT系统一直处于自动加速状态,并且已越来越迅速地传播到我们生活的各个方面。在许多部门中,这种无处不在的IT流被视为对社会发展的核心,并且在日本的意义上,IT可以看作是技术上实现成熟社会的资源。 IT的趋势似乎不可阻挡。从这个意义上讲,IT支配地位可以被视为异常,以至于以IT为中心的信息系统(以下简称IS)远未深刻理解人们和社会对复杂多样的生活需求,这导致从技术角度实施IT / IS,并相信我们可以做的所有事情现在都应该由IT / IS完成。但是,由于IT / IS已被嵌入到社会的各个方面并影响着我们的日常生活,因此,我们需要从“能力”的角度而不是从“能力”的角度来检查它们,换句话说,不是从角度来看技术(认知),但从直觉和对现实生活的感觉(动作)的角度出发。我们把现实从狭义的认知和现实的意义上看作为行动来描述(内山在理论和实践中,大同文化大学,东京,2003年)。我们对“ IT / IS”系统的两个类别(属于“现实”的类别和属于“现实”的类别)进行了区分。为了理解这种区别,我们建议,这不仅需要了解这些IT系统的设计,还需要了解其使用和评估的方法。为了执行IT / IS系统的评估过程,我们需要开发一种新的“欣赏”方法,使我们能够将“ IT / IS”重新考虑为“使用IT / IS的系统”。这个想法类似于贝克的想法(世界风险社会理论(译者:Shimamura K),Chikuma Scholastic Collection(日语),2010)反映了现代性。因此,我们在“ IT / IS”这两个系统类别(我们称之为“现实”)和“一个使用IT / IS的系统”这两个系统类别(我们称为“事实”)之间提出了严格的区分。处理“事实”的方法尚未开发,但Checkland和Poulter(学习行动,Wiley,纽约,2006年)软系统方法(以下称为SSM)打算处理此类系统。 ,即“人类活动系统”。他使用“适应”这一关键概念,即“基于共享现实与不同的个人世界观共处”,因此,他建议克服共识的概念,即与“现实”水平达成的共识。在本文中,我们采用的是基于SSM适应性的方法,而不是基于对“现实”水平的共识。通过使用这种方法论思想,我们重新考虑了技术上成熟的社会的问题,这可以看作是与“使用IT / IS的系统”有关的问题,而不是与IT / IS本身有关的问题。通过这样做,我们可以在IT / IS领域中得出一些创新的方向,而这是传统方法无法得出的。不确定我们的尝试是否会影响IT / IS的失控。我们通过研究研讨会的过程来说明这一目的,该研讨会的过程着重指出,即使是IT / IS的与会专家也对现在和将来越来越关注IT / IS解决方案的实施感到不安。我们认为,朝着这个目标迈出的第一步是探索IT / IS使用的新方向。第一步的目的是改变“异常”情况,并希望为重新定位A系统以使用IT / IS奠定基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号