...
首页> 外文期刊>Agriculture and Human Values >Weed control practices on Costa Rican coffee farms: is herbicide use necessary for small-scale producers?
【24h】

Weed control practices on Costa Rican coffee farms: is herbicide use necessary for small-scale producers?

机译:哥斯达黎加咖啡农场的杂草控制方法:小型生产者是否必须使用除草剂?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper presents research conducted during two coffee farming seasons in Costa Rica. The study examined coffee farmers’ weed management practices and is presented in the form of a case study of small-scale farmers’ use of labor and herbicides in weed management practices. Over 200 structured interviews were conducted with coffee farmers concerning their use of hired labor and family labor, weed management activities, support services, and expectations about the future of their coffee production. ANOVA and regression analyses describe the relationships between farm size, labor, and herbicide use, and three farm types (i.e., conventional, semi-conventional, and organic). Based on findings regarding the amount of labor used to manually control weeds on different types of farms (large farms, small conventional, semi-conventional, and organic farms) I am able to challenge small conventional farmers’ perceived need for herbicide use. Semi-structured interviews of coffee farmers and extension workers further revealed a dominant role played by agro-chemical companies in assisting farmers with production problems, and documented a high transaction cost for information provided from elsewhere. Chemical companies hire extension workers to visit farmers at their farms, free of charge, to offer recommendations on how to treat different pest problems, while government and cooperative extension agents charge for the service. There is a need to increase the amount of resources available to the National Coffee Institute to fund one-on-one farmer support services in order to balance the influence of agro-chemical company representatives and allow farmers to make better decisions regarding weed management.
机译:本文介绍了在哥斯达黎加的两个咖啡种植季节进行的研究。该研究检查了咖啡农的杂草管理做法,并以小农在杂草管理做法中使用劳动力和除草剂的案例研究的形式进行了介绍。对咖啡农进行了200多次结构化访谈,涉及他们雇用的劳动力和家庭劳动力的使用,杂草管理活动,支持服务以及对咖啡生产未来的期望。方差分析和回归分析描述了农场规模,劳动力和除草剂使用与三种农场类型(常规,半常规和有机)之间的关系。根据有关在不同类型的农场(大型农场,小型常规农场,半常规农场和有机农场)上用于人工控制杂草的劳动力数量的调查结果,我可以挑战常规农场主对除草剂使用的需求。对咖啡种植者和推广人员的半结构化访谈进一步揭示了农药公司在协助种植者遇到生产问题方面的主导作用,并记录了从其他地方提供的信息的高交易成本。化工公司免费雇用推广人员到农场探望农民,就如何处理各种有害生物问题提供建议,而政府和合作推广代理商则负责此项服务。有必要增加给国家咖啡研究所的资金,以资助一对一的农民支持服务,以平衡农用化学公司代表的影响,并让农民就杂草管理做出更好的决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号