首页> 外文期刊>Aging & Mental Health >Psychotropic medication discussions in older adults’ primary care office visits: So much to do, so little time
【24h】

Psychotropic medication discussions in older adults’ primary care office visits: So much to do, so little time

机译:老年人初级保健办公室就诊的精神科药物讨论:要做的事很多,时间却很少

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: To examine discussions of psychotropic medications during the older patient's visit to primary care physicians, identify how physician's competing demands influence these discussions, describe different scenarios physicians utilize to address mental health complaints of older adults, and recommend best practices for diagnosing and treating such patients. Method: Convenience sample of 59 videotapes of primary care office visits involving mental health discussions in the United States complemented by patient and physician surveys. Videotaped visits were examined using logistic regression for grouped-level data to explore contributions of physician's competing demands to the likelihood of having psychotropic medication discussions. Tape transcripts were selected to provide examples of prescribing and referral behaviors. Results: One-third of these visits contained no psychotropic medication discussions despite its important role in treating mental illnesses. When prescribing psychotropic medicines, physicians presented information about the medication's purpose and brand name more often than adverse effects or usage. More competing demands (i.e., more topics discussed or more leading causes of disability addressed during the visit) were associated with less psychotropic medication discussions. Selected case scenarios illustrate the importance of acknowledging mental illness, prescribing psychotropic medications, explaining the medications, and/or referring patients to mental health providers to address their mental health complaints. Conclusion: Competing demands may constrain discussions of psychotropic medications. Given the seriousness of mental illness in late life, system-level changes may be needed to correctly diagnose mental illness, take more proactive actions to improve mental health, and enhance information exchange concerning psychotropic medication in a manner that meets patients’ needs.View full textDownload full textKeywordspsychotropic medication discussions, competing demands, primary care, patient medication educationRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2010.548055
机译:目标:在老年患者去基层医疗机构就诊期间探讨精神药物的讨论,确定医师的竞争需求如何影响这些讨论,描述医师用于解决老年人心理健康问题的不同方案,并推荐诊断和治疗此类疾病的最佳做法耐心。方法:在美国进行的涉及精神卫生讨论的59张初级保健办公室就诊录像带的便利样本,并进行了患者和医生调查。使用logistic回归检查录像访问的分组级别数据,以探索医师竞争需求对进行精神药物讨论的可能性的贡献。选择磁带录音本以提供处方和推荐行为的示例。结果:尽管这些访问在治疗精神疾病中起着重要作用,但其中有三分之一没有进行精神药物讨论。处方精神药物时,医生会比副作用或用法更多地介绍有关药物用途和品牌的信息。竞争性需求增加(即,在就诊期间讨论了更多的话题或导致残疾的更多主要原因)与精神药物的讨论较少。选定的病例方案说明了承认精神疾病,开精神药物,解释药物和/或将患者转介给精神健康提供者以解决其精神健康投诉的重要性。结论:竞争需求可能会限制对精神药物的讨论。考虑到晚期精神疾病的严重性,可能需要系统级的更改才能正确诊断精神疾病,采取更加积极主动的行动来改善心理健康,并以符合患者需求的方式加强有关精神药物的信息交换。全文关键字:精神药物讨论,竞争性需求,初级保健,患者药物教育相关变量var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg, google,more“,发布号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2010.548055

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号