首页> 外文期刊>Aerospace >BASIC SCIENCE AND ART OF AIRCRAFT WRECKAGE RECONSTRUCTION
【24h】

BASIC SCIENCE AND ART OF AIRCRAFT WRECKAGE RECONSTRUCTION

机译:基础科学与艺术飞机残骸重建

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The author has both flying and airframe/powerplant experience with medium and large public transport aircraft, and his expertise shows throughout this book, which I found to be a useful refresher on basic investigation techniques. The title reflects the fact that sometimes the work resembles an art as much as a science and it was refreshing to see in Chapter 2 that 'physical evidence is king'. Often it is assumed that data recorders are essential to the investigation, yet sometimes the information they contain is corrupted or misleading and witnesses can be mistaken. Careful wreckage analysis is often the only or the final recourse. Some of the subjects covered - witness statements, crashworthiness, impact forces, human factors and the 'see and avoid' concept, for example, may seem surprising but they are all areas where the investigator who is 'kicking tin' must have a degree of expertise. The author introduces these matters with clarity and accuracy. His description of an initial visual appraisal without touching anything and his comments about the theft of wreckage are the practical considerations of an experienced investigator in the immediate aftermath of an accident.
机译:作者既有中型和大型公共交通飞机的飞行和机身/动力植物经验,以及他在本书中的专业知识显示,我发现是一种有用的进修,对基础调查技术进行了一种有用的进修。标题反映了有时工作与科学一样多的艺术,在第2章中看到“物理证据是王”的令人耳目一新。通常假设数据记录器对调查至关重要,但有时它们所包含的信息是损坏或误导性,并且证人可能会被误解。仔细的残骸分析通常是唯一或最终追索权。一些受试者涵盖 - 见证陈述,崩溃,冲击力,人为因素和“看到和避免”概念似乎令人惊讶,但它们是“踢锡”的调查人员必须具有一定程度的地区专业知识。作者以清晰度和准确性介绍了这些问题。他对未经触及任何事情的初始视觉评估的描述以及他关于盗窃盗窃的评论是经验丰富的调查人员在事故发生后的实际考虑因素。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Aerospace》 |2021年第6期|48-48|共1页
  • 作者

    Alan Simmons;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号