首页> 外文期刊>The Aeronautical Journal >Validation of mathematical models for helicopter flight simulators past, present and future challenges
【24h】

Validation of mathematical models for helicopter flight simulators past, present and future challenges

机译:验证直升机飞行模拟器过去,现在和将来面临的挑战的数学模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

At the heart of a flight simulator resides the mathematical representation of aircraft behaviour in response to control inputs, atmospheric disturbances and system inputs including failures and malfunctions. While this mathematical model can never be wholly accurate, its fidelity, in comparison with real world behaviour, underpins the usefulness of the flight simulator. The present paper examines the state of the art achieved in validating mathematical models for helicopter simulators, addressing the strengths and weaknesses of the present European standard for the qualification of helicopter flight simulators, JAR FSTD-H (previously JAR-STD-1H/2H/3H). Essential questions are examined, such as: What is the required model fidelity to guarantee a simulation is sufficiently representative to be fit for purpose? Are the tolerances set in the current standards fine enough that they lead to only minor changes in handling qualities? What is an acceptable tuning process for the simulation? What is the effect of modelling fidelity on the overall pilot control strategy? What is the relationship between the settings of the simulator cueing environment and the behaviour of the pilot? What is the industrial experience on qualification of flight simulators that might usefully inform developments? Many of these questions were addressed in Europe in a previous GARTEUR Action Group (AG) HC/AG-12 the results of which are documented in this paper. Solutions are proposed for improving the current JAR-FSTD standard with respect to validation of mathematical models.
机译:飞行模拟器的核心是飞机响应控制输入,大气干扰和系统输入(包括故障和故障)的行为的数学表示。尽管此数学模型永远不可能完全准确,但与真实世界的行为相比,其保真度是飞行模拟器实用性的基础。本文探讨了在验证直升机模拟器的数学模型方面所取得的最新进展,以解决目前欧洲直升机直升机模拟器资格认证标准的优缺点(以前是JAR-STD-1H / 2H / 3H)。检验了一些基本问题,例如:为了确保模拟具有足够的代表性以适合目的,所需的模型保真度是什么?当前标准中设置的公差是否足够精细,以致仅导致处理质量的微小变化?模拟可接受的调整过程是什么?模拟保真度对总体驾驶员控制策略有什么影响?模拟器提示环境的设置与飞行员的行为之间有什么关系?在飞行模拟器认证方面的行业经验是什么,可以有效地指导发展?在欧洲,以前的GARTEUR行动小组(AG)HC / AG-12解决了许多这些问题,其结果在本文中有记录。提出了用于在验证数学模型方面改善当前JAR-FSTD标准的解决方案。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Aeronautical Journal》 |2013年第1190期|343-388|共46页
  • 作者单位

    Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology Delft, The Netherlands;

    School of Engineering, The University of Liverpool Liverpool, UK;

    School of Engineering, The University of Liverpool Liverpool, UK;

    EUROCOPTER Germany Donauwoerth, Germany;

    German Aerospace Center - DLR, Lilienthalplatz Braunschweig, Germany;

    Office National d'Etudes et de Recherches Aerospatiales - ONERA Salon Cedex Air France;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:34:25

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号