首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Water Resources >Geologic heterogeneity and a comparison of two geostatistical models: Sequential Gaussian and transition probability-based geostatistical simulation
【24h】

Geologic heterogeneity and a comparison of two geostatistical models: Sequential Gaussian and transition probability-based geostatistical simulation

机译:地质异质性和两种地统计学模型的比较:顺序高斯和基于过渡概率的地统计学模拟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A covariance-based model-fitting approach is often considered valid to represent field spatial variability of hydraulic properties. This study examines the representation of geologic heterogeneity in two types of geostatistical models under the same mean and spatial covariance structure, and subsequently its effect on the hydraulic response to a pumping test based on 3D high-resolution numerical simulation and field data. Two geostatistical simulation methods, sequential Gaussian simulation (SGS) and transition probability indicator simulation (TPROGS) were applied to create conditional realizations of alluvial fan aquifer systems in the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) area. The simulated K fields were then used in a numerical groundwater flow model to simulate a pumping test performed at the LLNL site. Spatial connectivity measures of high-K materials (channel facies) captured connectivity characteristics of each geostatistical model and revealed that the TPROGS model created an aquifer (channel) network having greater lateral connectivity. SGS realizations neglected important geologic structures associated with channel and overbank (levee) facies, even though the covariance model used to create these realizations provided excellent fits to sample covariances computed from exhaustive samplings of TPROGS realizations. Observed drawdown response in monitoring wells during a pumping test and its numerical simulation shows that in an aquifer system with strongly connected network of high-K materials, the Gaussian approach could not reproduce a similar behavior in simulated drawdown response found in TPROGS case. Overall, the simulated drawdown responses demonstrate significant disagreement between TPROGS and SGS realizations. This study showed that important geologic characteristics may not be captured by a spatial covariance model, even if that model is exhaustively determined and closely fits the exponential function.
机译:基于协方差的模型拟合方法通常被认为对表示水力特性的现场空间变异性有效。本研究在相同的均值和空间协方差结构下研究了两种类型的地统计模型中地质异质性的表示形式,然后研究了其对基于3D高分辨率数值模拟和现场数据的抽水试验水力响应的影响。应用了两种地统计模拟方法,顺序高斯模拟(SGS)和过渡概率指标模拟(TPROGS)在劳伦斯利弗莫尔国家实验室(LLNL)地区创建了冲积扇含水层系统的条件实现。然后将模拟的K场用于数值地下水流模型中,以模拟在LLNL站点进行的抽水试验。高K物质(通道相)的空间连通性测度获得了每个地统计模型的连通性特征,并揭示了TPROGS模型创建了具有更大横向连通性的含水层(通道)网络。尽管用于创建这些实现的协方差模型非常适合根据TPROGS实现的详尽采样计算出的协方差,但SGS实现忽略了与通道和堤岸(堤)相相关的重要地质结构。在抽水试验期间在监测井中观察到的沉降响应及其数值模拟表明,在具有高K材料紧密连接网络的含水层系统中,高斯方法无法在TPROGS案例中的模拟沉降响应中再现类似的行为。总体而言,模拟的回落响应表明TPROGS和SGS实现之间存在重大分歧。这项研究表明,空间协方差模型可能无法捕获重要的地质特征,即使该模型已被详尽确定并非常适合指数函数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号