...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Therapy >Comparison of the effectiveness of reboxetine versus fluoxetine in patients with atypical depression: A single-blind, randomized clinical trial
【24h】

Comparison of the effectiveness of reboxetine versus fluoxetine in patients with atypical depression: A single-blind, randomized clinical trial

机译:瑞波西汀与氟西汀在非典型抑郁症中的疗效比较:一项单盲,随机临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The atypical subtype of depression appears to be well validated and common, and it is unique among Axis I disorders in theDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) in that it includes a personality trait, rejection sensitivity, as a criterion. Drug selection remains a challenge for the clinician who treats patients with this subtype of depression. Noradrenergic antidepressants have been thought to have prominent effects in improving such symptoms as loss of motivation, drive, and energy, which are among the core symptoms of patients with atypical depression. Thus it can be speculated that noradrenergic antidepressants might be superior to serotonergic antidepressants in reducing symptoms of atypical depression. This is the first study to compare the efficacy of fluoxetine, a selective reuptake inhibitor of serotonin, and reboxetine, a selective reuptake inhibitor of norepinephrine, in the treatment of patients with atypical depression. A total of 43 patients with atypical depression according to DSM-IV were randomly assigned to receive fluoxetine or reboxetine over an 8-wk clinical trial. Patients with a Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV diagnosis of personality disorder accounted for 54% of those with atypical depression in this sample. Patients with personality disorders were typically young and were unable to maintain a marriage. Adverse effects such as dry mouth, sweating, headache, and urinary retention were more prominent in the reboxetine group than among those given fluoxetine. Although a greater number of patients treated with reboxetine dropped out of treatment, the pattern of response was very similar for both drugs, and both were effective in reducing symptoms of depression. The presence of a personality disorder in patients with atypical depression did not affect the response to either of the antidepressants. These findings might suggest that drugs with norepinephrine or a 5-hydroxytryptamine mechanism of action might act through a common pathway, resulting in a similar response in terms of core symptoms of depression. If tolerability, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of antidepressants are considered, the best antidepressant is the one that can be used by the patient, whether or not a personality disorder accompanies atypical depression.
机译:抑郁症的非典型亚型似乎已得到充分验证和普遍,并且在《精神障碍诊断和统计手册-第四版》(DSM-IV)中的轴I障碍中是独特的,因为它包括人格特质,排斥反应敏感性,标准。对于治疗这种抑郁症亚型的患者,药物选择仍然是一个挑战。人们认为去甲肾上腺素能抗抑郁药在改善动机,驱动力和精力丧失等症状方面具有显著作用,这些症状是非典型抑郁症患者的核心症状。因此可以推测,在减轻非典型抑郁症状方面,去甲肾上腺素能抗抑郁药可能优于血清素能抗抑郁药。这是第一个比较氟西汀(5-羟色胺的选择性再摄取抑制剂)和瑞波西汀(去甲肾上腺素的选择性再摄取抑制剂)在治疗非典型性抑郁症患者中的疗效的第一项研究。在8周临床试验中,根据DSM-IV,总共有43名非典型抑郁症患者被随机分配接受氟西汀或瑞波西汀治疗。通过DSM-IV诊断为人格障碍的结构性临床访谈患者占本样本中非典型抑郁症患者的54%。人格障碍患者通常年轻,无法维持婚姻。瑞波西汀组的不良反应,如口干,出汗,头痛和尿retention留,比氟西汀组更为明显。尽管更多的接受瑞波西汀治疗的患者退出治疗,但两种药物的反应模式非常相似,并且两种药物均可有效减轻抑郁症状。非典型抑郁症患者的人格障碍的存在并不影响对任何一种抗抑郁药的反应。这些发现可能暗示具有去甲肾上腺素或5-羟色胺作用机制的药物可能通过共同途径起作用,导致抑郁症的核心症状发生类似反应。如果考虑抗抑郁药的耐受性,疗效和成本效益,那么无论人格障碍是否伴有非典型抑郁症,最好的抗抑郁药都是患者可以使用的抗抑郁药。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号