首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Concrete Construction >Comparison of displacement capacity of reinforced concrete columns with seismic codes
【24h】

Comparison of displacement capacity of reinforced concrete columns with seismic codes

机译:地震码钢筋混凝土柱位移能力比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The lateral displacement or drift may be the cause of the damage in the reinforced concrete (RC) columns under the seismic load. In many regulations, lateral displacement was limited according to the properties of columns. The design displacement limits may be represented indirectly through the material strain limits and the mechanical properties of columns. EUROCODE-8 and FEMA356 calculate displacement limits by taking into account the mechanical properties of columns. However, Turkey Building Earthquake Code (TBEC) determine displacement limits by taking into account the material strain limits. The aim of this study is to assess the seismic design codes for RC columns through an experimental study. The estimates of seismic design codes have been compared with the experimental results. It is observed that the lateral displacement capacities of columns estimated according to some seismic codes are not in agreement with the experimental results. Also, it is observed that TBEC is conservative in the context of the performance indicator of RC columns, compared to EUROCODE-8 and FEMA356. Moreover, in this study, plastic hinge length and effective stiffness of test elements were investigated.
机译:横向位移或漂移可能是在地震载荷下钢筋混凝土(RC)柱损坏的原因。在许多规定中,根据柱的性质有限地限制横向位移。设计位移限制可以间接地通过材料应变限制和柱的机械性能表示。 Eurocode-8和FEMA356考虑到柱的机械性能来计算位移限制。但是,土耳其建筑地震代码(TBEC)通过考虑到材料应变限制来确定位移限制。本研究的目的是通过实验研究评估RC柱的地震设计码。将地震设计码的估计与实验结果进行了比较。观察到,根据一些地震码估计的列的横向位移能力不与实验结果一致。此外,观察到,与欧洲码-8和FEMA356相比,TBEC在RC列的性能指标的上下文中是保守的。此外,在本研究中,研究了塑料铰链长度和有效的测试元件刚度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号