...
首页> 外文期刊>Advanced engineering informatics >Evaluating two model-free data interpretation methods for measurements that are influenced by temperature
【24h】

Evaluating two model-free data interpretation methods for measurements that are influenced by temperature

机译:评估两种不受温度影响的测量的无模型数据解释方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Interpreting measurement data to extract meaningful information for damage detection is a challenge for continuous monitoring of structures. This paper presents an evaluation of two model-free data interpretation methods that have previously been identified to be attractive for applications in structural engineering: moving principal component analysis (MPCA) and robust regression analysis (RRA). The effect of three factors are evaluated: (a) sensor-damage location, (b) traffic loading intensity and (c) damage level, using two criteria: damage detectability and the time to damage detection. In addition, the effects of these three factors are studied for the first time in situations with and without removing seasonal variations through use of a moving average filter and an ideal low-pass filter. For this purpose, a parametric study is performed using a numerical model of a railway truss bridge. Results show that MPCA has higher damage detectability than RRA. On the other hand, RRA detects damages faster than MPCA. Seasonal variation removal reduces the time to damage detection of MPCA in some cases while the benefits are consistently modest for RRA.
机译:解释测量数据以提取有意义的信息以进行损伤检测是连续监测结构的挑战。本文介绍了两种先前已被确定对结构工程应用有吸引力的无模型数据解释方法的评估:移动主成分分析(MPCA)和鲁棒回归分析(RRA)。使用以下两个标准评估了三个因素的影响:(a)传感器的损坏位置,(b)交通负荷强度和(c)损坏程度:损坏可检测性和损坏检测时间。另外,这三个因素的影响在有或没有通过使用移动平均滤波器和理想的低通滤波器消除季节变化的情况下首次进行了研究。为此,使用铁路桁架桥的数值模型进行参数研究。结果表明,MPCA比RRA具有更高的损伤检测能力。另一方面,RRA比MPCA更快地检测到损坏。在某些情况下,季节性变化消除功能减少了MPCA损坏检测的时间,而RRA的收益始终不大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号