首页> 外文期刊>Advanced energy materials >A Comparison of Five Experimental Techniques to Measure Charge Carrier Lifetime in Polymer/Fullerene Solar Cells
【24h】

A Comparison of Five Experimental Techniques to Measure Charge Carrier Lifetime in Polymer/Fullerene Solar Cells

机译:聚合物/富勒烯太阳能电池中五种测量载流子寿命的实验技术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is important to accurately measure the charge carrier lifetime, a crucial parameter that influences the collection efficiency in organic solar cells. Five transient and small perturbation experimental techniques that measure charge carrier lifetime are applied to a device composed of the polymer PDTSiTTz blended with the fullerene PCBM: time-resolved charge extraction (TRCE), transient absorption spectroscopy (TAS), photoinduced charge extraction by linearly increasing voltage (photo-CELIV), transient photovoltage, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The motivation is to perform a comprehensive comparison of several different lifetime measurement techniques on the same device in order to assess their relative accuracy, applicability to operational devices, and utility in data analysis. The techniques all produce similar charge carrier lifetimes at high charge densities, despite previous suggestions that transient methods are less accurate than small perturbation ones. At lower charge densities an increase in the apparent reaction order is observed. This may be related to surface recombination at the contacts beginning to dominate, or an inhomogeneous charge distribution. A combination of TAS and TRCE appears suitable. TAS enables the investigation of recombination mechanisms at early times since it is not limited by RC (resistance-capacitance product) or charge extraction losses. Conversely, TRCE is useful particularly at low densities when other mechanisms, such as surface recombination, may occur.
机译:准确测量载流子寿命很重要,这是影响有机太阳能电池收集效率的关键参数。将五种测量电荷载流子寿命的瞬态和小扰动实验技术应用于由聚合物PDTSiTTz与富勒烯PCBM混合而成的设备:时间分辨电荷提取(TRCE),瞬态吸收光谱(TAS),通过线性增加进行光诱导电荷提取电压(photo-CELIV),瞬态光电压和电化学阻抗谱。目的是在同一设备上对几种不同的寿命测量技术进行全面比较,以评估它们的相对准确性,对操作设备的适用性以及在数据分析中的实用性。尽管先前提出瞬态方法不如小扰动方法准确,但该技术在高电荷密度下均能产生相似的载流子寿命。在较低的电荷密度下,观察到的表观反应顺序增加。这可能与接触开始占优势的表面重组或电荷分布不均匀有关。 TAS和TRCE的组合似乎很合适。 TAS不受RC(电阻-电容产品)或电荷提取损失的限制,因此可以在早期研究重组机制。相反,当可能发生其他机制(例如表面重组)时,TRCE特别适用于低密度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号