...
首页> 外文期刊>Advanced energy materials >Theoretical versus Practical Energy: A Plea for More Transparency in the Energy Calculation of Different Rechargeable Battery Systems
【24h】

Theoretical versus Practical Energy: A Plea for More Transparency in the Energy Calculation of Different Rechargeable Battery Systems

机译:理论能量与实际能量:不同可充电电池系统能量计算中要求更高透明度的请求

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Electrochemical energy storage at a large scale poses one of the main technological challenges of this century. The scientific community in academia and industry worldwide intensively is exploring various alternative rechargeable battery concepts beside state-of-the-art lithium ion batteries (LIBs), for example, all-solid-state batteries, lithium/sulfur batteries, magnesium/sulfur batteries or dual-ion batteries that could outperform LIBs in different aspects. Often, these concepts also promise very high theoretical energies per mass or volume. However, as theoretical values exclude numerous relevant parameters, they do not translate directly into practically achievable energy values: The gaps between practical capacities and voltages compared to the theoretical values differ for each system. In order to provide high transparency and to illustrate which cell components are most important in the limitation of the practical energy values, in this study, the specific energies and energy densities are calculated in six subsequent steps-from the theoretical energy values of the active materials alone to the practical energy values in an 18650 cylindrical cell. By providing a tool to calculate the energy values of six different battery technologies with different assumptions made evident, this study aims for more transparency and reliability in the comparison of different cell chemistries.
机译:大规模的电化学储能构成了本世纪的主要技术挑战之一。全球学术界和工业界的科学界都在紧锣密鼓地探索除最先进的锂离子电池(LIB)以外的各种替代可充电电池概念,例如全固态电池,锂/硫电池,镁/硫电池或双离子电池在不同方面的表现可能优于LIB。通常,这些概念还承诺每质量或体积具有很高的理论能量。但是,由于理论值不包括许多相关参数,因此它们不能直接转换为实际可达到的能量值:与每个系统的理论值相比,实际容量和电压之间的差距有所不同。为了提供高透明度并说明在实际能量值的限制中哪些电池成分最重要,在本研究中,从活性材料的理论能量值开始,在随后的六个步骤中计算了比能量和能量密度仅限于18650圆柱电池中的实际能量值。通过提供一种工具来计算六种不同的电池技术的能量值,这些假设被证明是显而易见的,本研究旨在在比较不同的电池化学性质时提高透明度和可靠性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Advanced energy materials 》 |2019年第6期| 1803170.1-1803170.18| 共18页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Munster, Inst Phys Chem, MEET Battery Res Ctr, Corrensstr 46, D-48149 Munster, Germany;

    Univ Munster, Inst Phys Chem, MEET Battery Res Ctr, Corrensstr 46, D-48149 Munster, Germany;

    Forschungszentrum Julich GmbH, IEK 12, Helmholtz Inst Munster, Corrensstr 46, D-48149 Munster, Germany;

    Univ Munster, Inst Phys Chem, MEET Battery Res Ctr, Corrensstr 46, D-48149 Munster, Germany;

    Univ Munster, Inst Phys Chem, MEET Battery Res Ctr, Corrensstr 46, D-48149 Munster, Germany|Forschungszentrum Julich GmbH, IEK 12, Helmholtz Inst Munster, Corrensstr 46, D-48149 Munster, Germany;

    Univ Munster, Inst Phys Chem, MEET Battery Res Ctr, Corrensstr 46, D-48149 Munster, Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    all-solid-state batteries; dual-ion batteries; energy content; lithium/sulfur batteries; magnesium/sulfur batteries;

    机译:全固态电池;双离子电池;能量含量;锂/硫电池;镁/硫电池;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号