...
首页> 外文期刊>Ad hoc networks >DICSA: Distributed and concurrent link scheduling algorithm for data gathering in wireless sensor networks
【24h】

DICSA: Distributed and concurrent link scheduling algorithm for data gathering in wireless sensor networks

机译:DICSA:用于无线传感器网络中数据收集的分布式并发链路调度算法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although link scheduling has been used to improve the performance of data gathering applications, unfortunately, existing link scheduling algorithms are either centralized or they rely on specific assumptions that are not realistic in wireless sensor networks. In this paper, we propose a distributed and concurrent link scheduling algorithm, called DICSA, that requires no specific assumption regarding the underlying network. The operation of DICSA is managed through two algorithms: (ⅰ) Primary State Machine (PSM): Enables each node to perform its own slot reservation; (ⅱ) Secondary State Machine (SSM): Enables each node to concurrently participate in the slot reservation of its neighbors. Through these algorithms and a set of forbidden slots managed by them, DICSA provides concurrent and collision-free slot reservation. Our results show that the execution duration and energy consumption of DICSA are at least 50% and 40% less than that of DRAND, respectively. In terms of slot assignment efficiency, while our results show higher spatial reuse over DRAND, the maximum slot number assigned by DICSA is at least 60% lower than VDEC. In data-gathering applications, our results confirm the higher performance of DICSA in terms of throughput, delivery ratio and packet delay. We show that the network throughput achievable by DICSA is more than 50%, 70%, 90% and 170% higher than that of DRAND, SEEDEX, NCR and FPS, respectively.
机译:尽管链路调度已用于提高数据收集应用程序的性能,但不幸的是,现有的链路调度算法要么是集中式的,要么依赖于无线传感器网络中不切实际的特定假设。在本文中,我们提出了一种称为DICSA的分布式并发链路调度算法,该算法不需要有关基础网络的特定假设。 DICSA的操作通过两种算法进行管理:(ⅰ)主状态机(PSM):使每个节点能够执行自己的时隙预留; (ⅱ)次要状态机(SSM):使每个节点能够同时参与其邻居的时隙预留。通过这些算法以及由它们管理的一组禁止的时隙,DICSA提供并发且无冲突的时隙预留。我们的结果表明,DICSA的执行持续时间和能耗分别比DRAND少50%和40%。在时隙分配效率方面,虽然我们的结果显示空间重用率高于DRAND,但DICSA分配的最大时隙数至少比VDEC低60%。在数据收集应用程序中,我们的结果证实了DICSA在吞吐量,传递比率和数据包延迟方面的更高性能。我们显示,DICSA可实现的网络吞吐量分别比DRAND,SEEDEX,NCR和FPS高出50%,70%,90%和170%。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ad hoc networks》 |2015年第febaptaa期|54-71|共18页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Johor 81310, Malaysia,Networking Protocols Department, Institute for Infocomm Research (I~2R), A~*STAR, Singapore 138632, Singapore;

    Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Johor 81310, Malaysia,Networking Protocols Department, Institute for Infocomm Research (I~2R), A~*STAR, Singapore 138632, Singapore;

    Department of Computer Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA;

    Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Johor 81310, Malaysia;

    Networking Protocols Department, Institute for Infocomm Research (I~2R), A~*STAR, Singapore 138632, Singapore;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Scheduling algorithm; Interference; MAC;

    机译:调度算法;干扰;苹果电脑;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号