...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Physica Polonica >Shear Bond Strength Comparison between Conventional Dental Nano Zirconia Combinations and New Functionally Graded Nano Zirconia Combinations after Thermal-Mechanical Cycling
【24h】

Shear Bond Strength Comparison between Conventional Dental Nano Zirconia Combinations and New Functionally Graded Nano Zirconia Combinations after Thermal-Mechanical Cycling

机译:常规牙科纳米氧化锆组合物与新功能梯度纳米氧化锆组合物热机械循环后的剪切粘结强度比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of the study was to evaluate the core-veneer bond strength of graded zirconia combinations and compared those to conventional zirconia combinations after thermal and mechanical tests. Conventional zirconia--veneer combinations and graded zirconia-veneer combinations were made into cylinders. Prior to shear bond testing, half of each group was subjected to thermal and mechanical cycling testing at three conditional levels. All specimens were thereafter subjected to a shear force. The fractured surfaces were visually analyzed with scanning electron microscopy. The shear bond strength values of functionally graded zirconia combinations were significantly higher than zirconia combinations, irrespective of the fatigue conditions (P < 0.05). The shear bond strength values of graded zirconia combinations and zirconia combinations before thermal-mechanical cycling were higher than after (P < 0.05). The shear bond strength values of graded zirconia combinations was 40.99±2.22 MPa, 39.44±2.36 MPa, 37.45±2.06 MPa, and 36.87±2.18 MPa for conditions 0 to 3, respectively. The shear bond strength values were 26.75±2.16 MPa, 23.95±2.16 MPa, 21.65±2.14 MPa, and 20.49±2.16 MPa for zirconia combinations from conditions 0 to 3, respectively. The functionally graded zirconia combinations exhibited greater shear bond strength than zirconia combinations, irrespective of the fatigue conditions. Thermal-mechanical cycling had an impact on the shear bond strength of both graded zirconia combinations and conventional zirconia combinations.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估分级氧化锆组合的核心-中心键结合强度,并将其与常规氧化锆组合进行热和机械测试后进行比较。将常规的氧化锆-制片组合和分级的氧化锆-制片组合制成圆柱体。在剪切粘结测试之前,每组的一半在三个条件水平下进行了热和机械循环测试。此后,所有样品都受到剪切力。用扫描电子显微镜目测分析断裂的表面。无论疲劳条件如何,功能梯度氧化锆组合物的剪切粘结强度值均明显高于氧化锆组合物(P <0.05)。机械热循环前,分级氧化锆组合物和氧化锆组合物的剪切粘结强度值均高于之后(P <0.05)。在0至3的条件下,分级氧化锆组合物的剪切粘结强度值分别为40.99±2.22 MPa,39.44±2.36 MPa,37.45±2.06 MPa和36.87±2.18 MPa。在条件0至3下,氧化锆组合物的剪切粘结强度值分别为26.75±2.16 MPa,23.95±2.16 MPa,21.65±2.14 MPa和20.49±2.16 MPa。不论疲劳条件如何,功能分级的氧化锆组合物均表现出比氧化锆组合物更大的剪切粘结强度。热机械循环对梯度氧化锆组合物和常规氧化锆组合物的剪切粘结强度都有影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Acta Physica Polonica》 |2014年第2期|238-240|共3页
  • 作者单位

    The Medical Centre of Stomatology, the 1st Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510630, China;

    The Medical Centre of Stomatology, the 1st Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510630, China;

    Department of Stomatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China;

    Department of Stomatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号