首页> 外文期刊>Acta Geologica Sinica >Episodes of Cenozoic Gold Mineralization on the Eastern Margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: ~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar Dating and Implication for Geodynamic Events
【24h】

Episodes of Cenozoic Gold Mineralization on the Eastern Margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: ~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar Dating and Implication for Geodynamic Events

机译:青藏高原东缘新生代金矿化事件:〜(40)Ar /〜(39)Ar测年及其对地球动力学事件的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A lot of new gold deposits have been found on the eastern margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau during the past two decades. Among them, three main types of gold deposits have been recognized, including quartz-vein-type, shear-zone-type and porphyry-type. The former two types of gold deposits are mainly hosted within metamorphic rocks, while the latter is related to Cenozoic magmatism. Although all of these gold deposits are believed to have been formed during the uplift process of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in the Cenozoic era (Wang et al., 2002b), precise isotopic age constraints have still been lacking until quite recently. This paper presents new ~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar data of some gold deposits on the eastern margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, which indicate that gold mineralization in the region occurred in response to the episodic stages of the orogenies. Recently obtained ~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar data on quartz and feldspars from several gold deposits, such as the Sandiao deposit, the Baijintaizi deposit, the Pusagang deposits, provide new constraints on gold mineralization on the eastern margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Geochronological studies of gold deposits along the Daduhe River indicate that there are three stages of gold mineralization. The early two stages occurred as early as 65.1 Ma in the Shuibaiyang deposit and 58.95 Ma in the Ruoji deposit, while the latter stage occurred as late as 25.35 Ma in Baijintaizi and 24.70 Ma in Sandiao. Isotopic dating of three plagioclases from the Beiya deposit, Zhifanggou deposit and Luobodi deposit and a K-feldspar from the Jinchangqing deposit in Yunnan Province indicates that these deposits were formed at two stages. The Zhifanggou and Jinchangqing deposits have early stage records as old as 58.82 Ma in Zhifanggou and 55.49 Ma in Jinchangqing, but all of the above four deposits in Yunnan have late stage records of 23.18 Ma in Jinchangqing, 24.54 Ma in Zhifanggou, 24.60 Ma in Luobodi and 24.56 Ma in Hongnitang. The above results suggest that the gold deposits on the eastern margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau were formed concentratedly at two main episodes, i.e. the end of the Paleocene (about 58 Ma) and the boundary between the Paleogene and the Neogene (about 25 Ma). The later episode appears to be looks like more important and was coupled with the Sichuan movement, which was extensively activated at that period. The beginning of the Cenozoic Era (about 65 Ma) might be another episode of gold mineralization, but only one deposit (Shuibaiyang) in this study has been proved to have been be formed at this stage and might be earlier than the initial collision between the Indian Plate and the Eurasia Plate. In view of geology, the above three episodes of gold mineralization are associated with three events of tectonic-magmatism and/or fluid events. Even though the gold deposits (for example, the Shuibaiyang deposit, Ruoji deposit and Pusagang deposit) were formed at different episodes, all of them are genetically related to tectonic movements in large-scale shear zones. It looks like theat tectonic events (including large-scale strike-slip) between Paleogene and Neogene had a wide influence upon gold mineralization, with new deposits formed and old deposits enriched or superimposed to be a higher grade by new stage of mineralization. The above data suggest that gold deposits were not only concentrated in some areas, but also formed mainly at different boundaries of geological times, indicating that there existed some peak stages of gold mineralization (metallogenic episodes), and that the gold deposits were formed mainly by episodic mineralization.
机译:在过去的二十年中,在青藏高原的东缘发现了许多新的金矿。其中,已识别出三种主要类型的金矿床,包括石英脉型,剪切带型和斑岩型。前两种类型的金矿床主要存在于变质岩中,而后者则与新生代岩浆作用有关。尽管所有这些金矿床都被认为是在新生代青藏高原的隆升过程中形成的(Wang等,2002b),但是直到最近,仍然缺乏精确的同位素年龄约束。本文介绍了青藏高原东缘一些金矿的新的〜(40)Ar /〜(39)Ar数据,表明该地区的金矿化是发生在造山运动发生的阶段。最近从三条金矿,白金台子金矿,普萨刚金矿等金矿中获得的石英和长石的〜(40)Ar /〜(39)Ar数据,为青海东缘的金矿化提供了新的限制-西藏高原。大渡河沿岸金矿的地质年代学研究表明,金矿化分为三个阶段。前两个阶段发生在水白洋矿床中,分别为65.1 Ma和58.95 Ma,而后期白金台子矿床中则为25.35 Ma,三条矿床为24.70 Ma。来自云南省贝亚矿床,纸坊沟矿床和罗伯底矿床的三个斜长石和云南金昌庆矿床的钾长石的同位素定年表明,这些矿床是分两个阶段形成的。纸坊沟和金昌清矿床的早期记录分别为纸坊沟58.82 Ma和金昌庆的55.49 Ma,但云南以上四个矿床的晚期记录都分别为金昌清23.18 Ma,纸坊沟24.54 Ma,罗伯底24.60 Ma。和在洪尼当的24.56 Ma。上述结果表明,青藏高原东缘的金矿床主要集中在两个新的时期,即古新世末期(约58 Ma)和古近纪与新近纪之间的边界(约25 Ma)。 )。后来的情节似乎更重要,并且与四川运动相呼应,该运动在那个时期被广泛启动。新生代(约65 Ma)的开始可能是金矿化的另一次事件,但在此研究中仅证实有一个矿床(水白洋)形成,并且可能早于金矿之间的初始碰撞。印度板块和欧亚大陆板块。从地质学的角度来看,上述三个金矿化事件与构造岩浆作用和/或流体事件三个事件有关。尽管金矿床(例如水白洋矿床,若吉矿床和普萨刚矿床)形成于不同的时期,但它们都与大范围剪切带的构造运动有遗传关系。看起来古近纪和新近纪之间的大地构造事件(包括大规模的走滑)对金矿化具有广泛的影响,形成了新的矿床,而旧矿床在成矿的新阶段被富集或叠加为更高品位。上述数据表明,金矿床不仅集中在某些地区,而且主要在地质时代的不同边界形成,表明存在金矿化的高峰期(成矿期),金矿床主要是由金矿形成的。间歇性矿化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号