...
首页> 外文期刊>ACP Journal Club >Review: Atenolol may be ineffective for reducing cardiovascular morbidity or all-cause mortality in primary hypertension
【24h】

Review: Atenolol may be ineffective for reducing cardiovascular morbidity or all-cause mortality in primary hypertension

机译:综述:阿替洛尔可能无法有效降低原发性高血压的心血管发病率或全因死亡率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

QuestionnIn patients with primary hypertension, does atenolol reduce cardiovascular morbidity or all-cause mortality?nnMethodsnnData sources: The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, relevant textbooks, and researchers in hypertension.nnStudy selection and assessment: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effect of atenolol (as the sole first-line drug in 1 of the treatment groups) on cardiovascular morbidity or mortality in patients with primary hypertension. Studies were also required to have predefined criteria for myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death.nnOutcomes: Myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality.nnnMain resultsnn8 RCTs met the selection criteria. 1 of the 8 RCTs had 3 arms corresponding to treatment with atenolol, a thiazide diuretic, or placebo. 2 major comparisons were made. Atenonol compared with placebo or with untreated controls (4 RCTs, n = 6825): Mean reduction in blood pressure (BP) attributed to atenolol ranged from 4.0 to 18.0 mm Hg systolic and 2.9 to 11.0 mm Hg diastolic. The groups did not differ for myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular mortality, or all-cause mortality (Table). Atenolol compared with other antihypertensive drugs (5 RCTs, n = 17 671): Comparison antihypertensive drugs included hydrochlorothiazide or bendroflumethiazide (1 RCT), hydrochlorothiazide (1 RCT), captopril (1 RCT), losartan (1 RCT), and lacidipine (1 RCT). Mean BP change with atenolol compared with alternatives ranged from −1.0 to 1.1 mm Hg systolic and −1.0 to 0.5 mm Hg diastolic. The rates of stroke and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality were greater in the atenolol group than in the other antihypertensive drug group (Table). The groups did not differ for rates of myocardial infarction (Table).
机译:问题在原发性高血压患者中,阿替洛尔能降低心血管疾病的发病率或全因死亡率吗?nn方法nn数据来源:Cochrane图书馆,MEDLINE,相关教科书和高血压研究人员.nn研究选择和评估:随机对照试验(RCT)评估了高血压的疗效阿替洛尔(一种治疗组中唯一的一线药物)对原发性高血压患者的心血管疾病发病率或死亡率的影响。还需要进行研究以制定心肌梗塞,中风和心血管疾病死亡的预定标准。nn结果:心肌梗塞,中风,心血管疾病的死亡率和全因死亡率。nnn主要结果nn8个RCT符合选择标准。 8个RCT中的1个具有3个臂,分别对应于阿替洛尔,噻嗪类利尿剂或安慰剂的治疗。进行了2个主要比较。与安慰剂或未经治疗的对照组相比,阿替洛尔(4个RCT,n = 6825):归因于阿替洛尔的平均血压降低(BP)为收缩压4.0至18.0 mm Hg和舒张期2.9至11.0 mm Hg。各组在心肌梗塞,中风,心血管疾病死亡率或全因死亡率方面无差异(表)。阿替洛尔与其他降压药的比较(5个RCT,n = 17671):比较降压药包括氢氯噻嗪或苯达氟甲嗪(1 RCT),氢氯噻嗪(1 RCT),卡托普利(1 RCT),氯沙坦(1 RCT)和拉西地平(1 RCT)。与替代品相比,阿替洛尔的平均BP变化范围为-1.0至1.1 mm Hg收缩压和-1.0至0.5 mm Hg舒张压。阿替洛尔组的中风,心血管疾病和全因死亡率高于其他降压药组(表)。各组的心肌梗死发生率无差异(表)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《ACP Journal Club 》 |2005年第3期| p.00000059-00000059| 共1页
  • 作者

    J. Kennedy Cruickshank MD;

  • 作者单位

    Manchester Royal InfirmaryManchester, England, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号