首页> 外文期刊>ACP Journal Club >Stenting led to more stroke or death than did carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic carotid stenosis > 60%
【24h】

Stenting led to more stroke or death than did carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic carotid stenosis > 60%

机译:在有症状的颈动脉狭窄中,支架术比颈动脉内膜切除术导致更多的中风或死亡> 60%

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

While they have described very important basic concepts of evidence-based medicine in relation to noninferiority trials, we felt that an important aspect of trial methodology is of concern. Previous studies have shown that patients undergoing CAS have a higher risk for postprocedural stroke if cerebral protection devices (CPDs) are not used (2). In the EVA-3S study (3), the operators used various CPDs as per the trial protocol, whereas in the SPACE trial (4), these devices were not used in most cases. This very important technical difference impacts outcomes of such high-risk procedures. Differences in methodology always need to be carefully considered when evaluating device trials and when practicing evidence-based medicine.
机译:尽管他们描述了与非劣效性试验相关的非常重要的循证医学基本概念,但我们认为,试验方法学的重要方面值得关注。先前的研究表明,如果不使用脑保护装置(CPD),接受CAS的患者发生手术后中风的风险更高(2)。在EVA-3S研究(3)中,操作员根据试验方案使用了各种CPD,而在SPACE试验(4)中,大多数情况下未使用这些设备。这种非常重要的技术差异会影响此类高风险程序的结果。在评估设备试验和实践循证医学时,始终需要仔细考虑方法上的差异。

著录项

  • 来源
    《ACP Journal Club》 |2007年第2期|p.11-11|共1页
  • 作者单位

    Thomas A. Hennebry, MB BCh, BAO, FACC, FSCAIUniversity of Oklahoma,Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号