首页> 外文期刊>BioScience >Heparin prophylaxis did not increase mortality and was beneficial in adults with sepsis receiving drotrecogin alfa
【24h】

Heparin prophylaxis did not increase mortality and was beneficial in adults with sepsis receiving drotrecogin alfa

机译:肝素的预防并没有增加死亡率,对败血症接受drotrecogin alfa的成人有益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

QuestionnnIn adults with severe sepsis who are receiving drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DrotAA), is co-administration of heparin thromboprophylaxis equivalent to placebo? nnMethodsnnDesign: Randomized, placebo-controlled, equivalence trial (Xigris and Prophylactic HepaRin Evaluation in Severe Sepsis [XPRESS]).nnAllocation: {Concealed}†.*nnBlinding: Blinded (patients, {clinicians, and outcome assessors}†).*nnFollow-up period: 28 days.nnSetting: 224 sites in 20 countries in North, Central, and South America; Europe; Asia; and Australia.nnPatients: 1994 patients who were 18 years of age (mean age 59 y, 59% men), received treatment for severe sepsis, and had multiple organ dysfunction or a relatively high risk for death (i.e., Acute Physiology Age and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II score 25). Exclusion criteria were heparin contraindication; need for higher heparin dose than that specified in protocol or other anticoagulant medication; creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min; life expectancy < 28 days; and patient, family, or attending physician declining aggressive sepsis therapy.nnIntervention: Unfractionated heparin (UFH), 5000 U subcutaneously twice daily (n = 511), low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) (enoxaparin), 40 mg subcutaneously once daily (n = 493), or placebo twice daily (n = 990). All patients received DrotAA at 24 µg/kg per hour for 96 hours. The first study drug injection was given as soon as possible after the DrotAA infusion was started and continued every 12 hours until the DrotAA infusion was completed.nnOutcomes: All-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included bleeding events, venous thromboembolism, and ischemic stroke.nnPatient follow-up: 97% (intention-to-treat analysis).nnnMain resultsnnAt 28 days, 275 patients had died in the heparin group, and 305 had died in the placebo group. The lower limit of the 90% CI for the absolute risk difference exceeded the prespecified boundaries (Table); therefore, the criteria for equivalence were not met. The Table shows the safety results. nnConclusionnnIn adults with severe sepsis who were receiving drotrecogin alfa (activated), heparin thromboprophylaxis did not increase mortality and was safe with respect to other clinical outcomes.
机译:在患有败血症的成年人中,接受drotrecogin alfa(活化)(DrotAA)治疗的成年人,肝素血栓预防的共同给药是否等同于安慰剂? nnMethodsnnDesign:随机,安慰剂对照的等效试验(严重脓毒症的Xigris和预防性肝素评估[XPRESS])。nn分配:{隐藏}†。* nn致盲:盲人(患者,{临床医生和结果评估者}†)。* nn设置期限:28天。nn设置:北美,中美洲和南美洲20个国家/地区的224个站点;欧洲;亚洲;患者:1994年,年龄18岁(平均年龄59岁,男性59%),接受过严重脓毒症的治疗,患有多器官功能障碍或相对较高的死亡风险(即,急性生理年龄和慢性)健康评估[APACHE] II得分25)。排除标准为肝素禁忌症。需要高于方案或其他抗凝药物规定的肝素剂量;肌酐清除率<30 mL / min;预期寿命<28天; nn干预措施:普通肝素(UFH),每天两次皮下注射5000 U(n = 511),低分子量肝素(LMWH)(依诺肝素),每天皮下注射40 mg (n = 493)或安慰剂,每天两次(n = 990)。所有患者在96小时内均以每小时24 µg / kg的剂量服用DrotAA。开始DrotAA输注后应尽快进行首次研究药物注射,并每12小时持续一次,直到DrotAA输注完成。nn结果:全因死亡率。次要结果包括出血事件,静脉血栓栓塞和缺血性中风nn患者随访率:97%(意向性治疗分析)nnn主要结果nn在第28天,肝素组死亡275例患者,安慰剂组305例死亡组。绝对风险差异的90%CI的下限超出了预定范围(表);因此,不符合等效标准。该表显示了安全性结果。结论对于患有drotrecogin alfa(活化)的严重脓毒症成年人,肝素血栓预防并未增加死亡率,并且相对于其他临床结局而言是安全的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《BioScience》 |2008年第2期|p.32-32|共1页
  • 作者

    Deborah Cook MD;

  • 作者单位

    McMaster UniversityHamilton, Ontario, Canada;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号