...
首页> 外文期刊>BioScience >Implementation of an evidence-based feeding guideline did not reduce mortality in intensive care units
【24h】

Implementation of an evidence-based feeding guideline did not reduce mortality in intensive care units

机译:实施循证喂养指南并不能降低重症监护病房的死亡率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

QuestionnnDoes implementation of an evidence-based nutritional support guideline improve feeding practices and reduce mortality in patients in intensive care units (ICUs)? nnMethodsnnDesign: Cluster-randomized controlled trial. Australian New Zealand Trials Registry. ACTRN12608000407392.nnAllocation: Concealed.*nnBlinding: Unblinded.*nnFollow-up period: 20 weeks (individual patients were followed until death or hospital discharge).nnSetting: 27 level II or III ICUs in Australia and New Zealand.nnPatients: 1118 adults (mean age 59 y, 61% men) who were recently admitted to the ICU and expected to stay > 2 days and were not tolerating an oral diet. Palliative care, moribund, or brain-dead patients and those admitted from another ICU were excluded.nnIntervention: Development and implementation of a nutrition guideline (14 ICUs, 561 patients) or maintenance of usual feeding protocols (13 ICUs, 557 patients). The intensive care specialist and dietitian coinvestigators from each intervention ICU participated in a 2-day conference to develop the evidence-based feeding guideline. Physicians and staff at intervention ICUs were exposed to a multifaceted practice change strategy, including lectures, individual encouragement, active and passive reminders, and feedback.nnOutcomes: ICU and hospital mortality and length of stay, and process measures.nnPatient follow-up: 100% (intention-to-treat analysis).nnnMain resultsnnThe guideline intervention increased the proportion of ICU patients receiving nutritional support (95% vs 73%, P < 0.001) and fed within 24 hours of admission (61% vs 37%, P < 0.001), reduced mean time to first parenteral feeding (1.0 vs 1.4 d, P = 0.04) and first enteral feeding (0.8 vs 1.4 d, P < 0.001), and increased mean proportion of days in the ICU that patients were fed (81% vs 69%, P = 0.002). Groups did not differ for mortality or length of stay (Table). nnConclusionnnA multifaceted practice change strategy to implement an evidence-based nutritional support guideline improved feeding practices in intensive care units but did not reduce mortality.
机译:问题实施循证营养支持指南是否可以改善加护病房的喂养习惯并降低患者的死亡率? nnMethodsnnDesign:集群随机对照试验。澳大利亚新西兰审判注册处。 ACTRN12608000407392.nn分配:隐藏。* nn盲:无盲。* nn随访时间:20周(随访患者直至死亡或出院).nn设置:澳大利亚和新西兰的27级II或III级ICU.nn患者:1118名成年人(平均年龄59岁,61%的男性),最近被送入ICU,预计会停留超过2天,并且不耐受口服饮食。姑息治疗,垂死或脑死亡患者以及从另一家ICU入院的患者被排除在外。干预措施:制定和实施营养指南(14个ICU,561例患者)或维持常规喂养方案(13个ICU,557例患者)。来自ICU每次干预的重症监护专家和营养师联合调查人员参加了为期2天的会议,以制定基于证据的喂养指南。干预ICU的医师和工作人员要接受多方面的实践变更策略,包括演讲,个人鼓励,主动和被动提醒以及反馈.nn结果:ICU和医院死亡率,住院时间和处理措施.nn患者随访情况:100 nnn主要结果nn指导性干预增加了接受营养支持并在入院24小时内进食的ICU患者的比例(95%vs 73%,P <0.001) 0.001),首次肠胃外喂养的平均时间减少(1.0 vs 1.4 d,P = 0.04)和首次肠内喂养的平均时间(0.8 vs 1.4 d,P <0.001),并增加了患者接受ICU的平均天数比例(81 %vs 69%,P = 0.002)。各组的死亡率或住院时间无差异(表)。 nn结论nn实施基于证据的营养支持指南的多方面实践改变策略,可改善重症监护病房的喂养习惯,但并未降低死亡率。

著录项

  • 来源
    《BioScience》 |2009年第5期|p.13-13|共1页
  • 作者

    Mauricio Ferri MD;

  • 作者单位

    Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreToronto, Ontario, Canada;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号