...
首页> 外文期刊>BioScience >Fractional flow reserve–guided PCI reduced major adverse cardiac outcomes compared with angiography-guided PCI in multivessel CAD
【24h】

Fractional flow reserve–guided PCI reduced major adverse cardiac outcomes compared with angiography-guided PCI in multivessel CAD

机译:与血管造影术引导的PCI在多支血管CAD中相比,分数血流储备引导的PCI减少了严重的不良心脏预后

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

QuestionnnIn patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) having percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), does routine measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) using angiography improve cardiac outcomes? nnMethodsnnDesign: Randomized controlled trial (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation [FAME] study). ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00267774.nnAllocation: {Concealed}†.*nnBlinding: Blinded (outcome assessors).*nnFollow-up period: 1 year.nnSetting: 20 medical centers in the USA and Europe.nnPatients: 1005 patients (mean age 64 y, 74% men) with multivessel CAD (coronary artery stenosis 50% of vessel diameter in 2 of 3 major epicardial coronary arteries) who were having PCI. Exclusion criteria included angiographically significant left main CAD, previous coronary artery bypass surgery, cardiogenic shock, extremely tortuous or calcified coronary arteries, and contraindication to drug-eluting stents.nnIntervention: FFR- (n = 509) or angiography-guided (n = 496) PCI with drug-eluting stents. The FFR group received stents for lesions of FFR 0.8, whereas the angiography group received stents for all lesions. All patients took aspirin and clopidogrel for 1 year after PCI.nnOutcomes: Included major adverse cardiac events (composite of death, myocardial infarction [MI], and repeated revascularization), individual components of the composite endpoint, and health-related quality of life.nnPatient follow-up: 98% (100% included in intention-to-treat analysis).nnnMain resultsnnFewer patients in the FFR group had major adverse cardiac events compared with the angiography group (Table). Groups did not differ for individual components of the composite endpoint (Table) or health-related quality of life. nnConclusionnnMeasurement of fractional flow reserve using angiography reduced a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and repeated revascularization compared with angiography alone in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease having percutaneous coronary intervention.
机译:在患有经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的多支冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者中,使用血管造影术常规测量分数血流储备(FFR)是否能改善心脏预后? nnMethodsnnDesign:随机对照试验(用于多支血管评估[FAME]的部分流量储备与血管造影术研究)。 ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00267774.nn分配:{隐藏}†。* nn盲:盲(结果评估者)。* nn随访期:1年。nn设置:美国和欧洲的20个医疗中心。nn患者:1005名患者(平均年龄64岁) ,74%的男性)患有多支血管PCI(3个主要心外膜冠状动脉中的2个冠状动脉狭窄占血管直径的50%)。排除标准包括血管造影显着的左主CAD,先前的冠状动脉搭桥手术,心源性休克,极度曲折或钙化的冠状动脉以及禁忌使用药物洗脱支架.nn干预:FFR-(n = 509)或以血管造影术指导(n = 496) )PCI和药物洗脱支架。 FFR组接受FFR 0.8病变支架,而血管造影组接受所有病变支架。所有患者均在PCI后服用阿司匹林和氯吡格雷1年。结果:包括严重的心脏不良事件(死亡,心肌梗死[MI]和反复血运重建),复合终点的各个组成部分以及与健康相关的生活质量。 nn患者随访率:98%(意向性治疗分析中包括100%)。nn主要结果nn与血管造影术组相比,FFR组中发生心脏不良事件的患者更少(表)。对于复合终点(表)的各个组成部分或与健康相关的生活质量,各组没有差异。结论相比于单独使用血管造影术,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者,使用血管造影术测量分流储备减少了死亡,心肌梗塞和反复血运重建的综合情况。

著录项

  • 来源
    《BioScience 》 |2009年第5期| p.7-7| 共1页
  • 作者

    Arun Kalyanasundaram MD;

  • 作者单位

    Geisinger ClincDanville, Pennsylvania, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号