...
首页> 外文期刊>ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems >Bridging the Gap Between Ethics and Practice: Guidelines for Reliable, Safe, and Trustworthy Human-centered AI Systems
【24h】

Bridging the Gap Between Ethics and Practice: Guidelines for Reliable, Safe, and Trustworthy Human-centered AI Systems

机译:弥合道德与实践之间的差距:可靠,安全,值得信赖的人以人为本的AI系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This article attempts to bridge the gap between widely discussed ethical principles of Human-centered AI (HCAI) and practical steps for effective governance. Since HCAI systems are developed and implemented in multiple organizational structures, I propose 15 recommendations at three levels of governance: team, organization, and industry. The recommendations are intended to increase the reliability, safety, and trustworthiness of HCAI systems: (1) reliable systems based on sound software engineering practices, (2) safety culture through business management strategies, and (3) trustworthy certification by independent oversight. Software engineering practices within teams include audit trails to enable analysis of failures, software engineering workflows, verification and validation testing, bias testing to enhance fairness, and explainable user interfaces. The safety culture within organizations comes from management strategies that include leadership commitment to safety, hiring and training oriented to safety, extensive reporting of failures and near misses, internal review boards for problems and future plans, and alignment with industry standard practices. The trustworthiness certification comes from industry-wide efforts that include government interventions and regulation, accounting firms conducting external audits, insurance companies compensating for failures, nongovernmental and civil society organizations advancing design principles, and professional organizations and research institutes developing standards, policies, and novel ideas. The larger goal of effective governance is to limit the dangers and increase the benefits of HCAI to individuals, organizations, and society.
机译:本文试图弥合人们普遍讨论人以人为本的AI(HCAI)的道德原则和有效治理的实际步骤之间的差距。由于HCAI系统在多个组织结构中开发和实施,因此我提出了三个治理水平的建议:团队,组织和行业。该建议旨在提高HCAI系统的可靠性,安全性和可信度:(1)基于声音软件工程实践的可靠系统,(2)通过业务管理策略,(3)通过独立监督的值得信赖的认证。团队中的软件工程实践包括审计跟踪,以实现故障分析,软件工程工作流程,验证和验证测试,偏置测试以增强公平性,并解释为可解释的用户界面。组织内的安全文化来自管理策略,包括领导致力于安全,招聘和培训,以安全,广​​泛的故障报告以及近期未命中,内部审查委员会的问题和未来计划,以及与行业标准实践的一致性。可靠性认证来自行业范围内的努力,包括政府干预和监管,核算公司进行外部审计,保险公司赔偿失败,非政府和民间社会组织推进设计原则,专业组织和研究机构制定标准,政策和小说想法。有效治理的较大目标是限制危险,并增加HCAI对个人,组织和社会的益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号