...
首页> 外文期刊>ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) >The spatial resolution of crossmodal attention : Implications for the design of multimodal interfaces
【24h】

The spatial resolution of crossmodal attention : Implications for the design of multimodal interfaces

机译:跨模式注意的空间分辨率:对多模式界面设计的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Previous research on crossmodal attentional orienting has reported speeded reaction times (RT) when the stimuli from the different modalities are in the same spatial location and slowed RTs when the stimuli are presented in very different locations (e.g., opposite sides of the body). However, little is known about what occurs for spatial interactions between these two extremes. We systematically varied the separation between cues and targets to quantify the spatial distribution of crossmodal attention. The orthogonal cueing paradigm [Spence et al. 1998] was used. Visual targets presented above or below the forearm were preceded by either vibrotactile cues presented on the forearm, auditory cues presented below the forearm, or visual cues presented on the forearm. The presentation of both unimodal and crossmodal cues led to a roughly monotonic increase in RT as a function of the cue-target separation. Unimodal visual cueing resulted in an attentional focus that was significantly narrower than that produced by crossmodal cues: the distribution of visual attention for visual cues had roughly half of the lateral extent of that produced by tactile cueing and roughly one fourth of the lateral extent as that produced by auditory cueing. This occurred when both seven (Experiment 1) and three (Experiment 2) cue locations were used suggesting that the effects are not primarily due to differences in the ability to localize the cues. These findings suggest that the location of tactile and auditory warning signals does not have to be controlled as precisely as the location of visual warning signals to facilitate a response to the critical visual event.
机译:以前关于交叉模态注意定向的研究已经报道了当来自不同模态的刺激物在相同的空间位置时加快了反应时间(RT),而当刺激物出现在非常不同的位置(例如身体的相对侧)时则放慢了RTs。但是,对于这两个极端之间的空间相互作用发生了什么知之甚少。我们系统地改变提示和目标之间的间隔,以量化交叉模式注意的空间分布。正交提示范例[Spence等。 1998]。出现在前臂上方或下方的视觉目标之前,是出现在前臂的触觉提示,出现在前臂下方的听觉提示或出现在前臂的视觉提示。单峰和跨峰提示的呈现导致RT大致单调增加,这是提示-目标间隔的函数。单峰视觉提示产生的注意力集中度比跨峰提示产生的注意力要窄得多:视觉提示的视觉注意分布的横向范围大约是触觉提示的横向范围的一半,而横向范围大约是触觉提示的横向范围的四分之一。由听觉提示产生。当同时使用七个(实验1)和三个(实验2)提示位置时发生这种情况,这表明效果并非主要是由于提示的定位能力不同。这些发现表明,触觉和听觉警告信号的位置不必像视觉警告信号的位置那样精确地控制,以促进对关键视觉事件的响应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号