首页> 外文期刊>ACI Materials Journal >Comparison of Field-Oriented Test Methods to Assess Dynamic Stability of Self-Consolidating Concrete
【24h】

Comparison of Field-Oriented Test Methods to Assess Dynamic Stability of Self-Consolidating Concrete

机译:评估自固结混凝土动态稳定性的现场试验方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The successful casting of self-consolidating concrete (SCC) necessitates that the concrete achieves a high level of deformability to flow into place and fill the formwork without consolidation. Such concrete should exhibit adequate stability to ensure flow among closely spaced obstacles with minimum risk of segregation. The selection of effective test methods to assess stability is critical for the successful design and placement of SCC. A two-pan experimental program was undertaken to compare a number of test methods that can be used to evaluate both the dynamic and static stability of SCC. Methods pertaining to dynamic stability are discussed in this paper and include visual observation of spread out concrete, flow testing of concrete using various test apparatus (JRing, L-box, U-box, and V-funnel), and the pressure bleed test. In total, 16 SCC mixtures proportioned with or without viscosity-modifying admixture, with slump flow consistencies of 615 +- 15 mm and 715 +- 15 mm, were investigated. Test results show that some of the dynamic stability parameters influencing the passing ability of SCC can be related to rheological properties of the concrete. Mixtures with an apparent yield value g of 0.3 to 1.7 N.m and a torque plastic viscosity h of 17 to 27 N.m.s are found to ensure high passing ability determined using the L-box flow test. The L-box flow time of these mixtures can range between 4 and 8 s. Good correlations are established between h and the T_(50)flow time, corresponding to the duration to attain 500 mm slump flow spread. Similar correlations are established with flow time determined with the V-funnel, L-box, and U-box test apparatus. The L-box test can enable simultaneously the evaluation of deformability and narrow-opening passing ability characteristics and is recommended along with the slump flow test for field-oriented quality control of SCC. The pressure bleed test is suitable to evaluate the ability of the paste to retain free water in suspension and may be used to quantitatively evaluate the stability of SCC in the field.
机译:自密实混凝土(SCC)的成功浇铸需要混凝土实现高水平的可变形性,以使其就位并填充模板而不会发生固结。此类混凝土应表现出足够的稳定性,以确保在间隔很小的障碍物之间流动,并最大程度地降低分离风险。选择有效的测试方法来评估稳定性对于SCC的成功设计和放置至关重要。进行了一个两阶段的实验程序,以比较可用于评估SCC的动态和静态稳定性的多种测试方法。本文讨论了与动力稳定性有关的方法,包括目视观察摊开的混凝土,使用各种测试设备(JRing,L型箱,U型箱和V型漏斗)进行混凝土的流动测试以及压力渗漏测试。总共研究了16种SCC混合物,按比例添加或不添加粘度调节剂,坍落度为615±15 mm和715±15 mm。试验结果表明,影响SCC通过能力的一些动态稳定性参数可能与混凝土的流变性能有关。发现具有0.3至1.7N.m的表观屈服值g和17至27N.m.s的扭转塑性粘度h的混合物确保了使用L-box流动试验确定的高通过能力。这些混合物的L箱流动时间范围为4到8 s。在h和T_(50)流动时间之间建立了良好的相关性,对应于获得500 mm坍落流动扩展的持续时间。用V型漏斗,L型箱和U型箱测试设备确定的流动时间可以建立类似的相关性。 L箱测试可同时评估变形能力和窄口通过能力特性,建议与坍落流测试一起用于SCC的现场质量控制。压力泄漏测试适合评估糊剂在悬浮液中保留游离水的能力,可用于定量评估SCC在现场的稳定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号