首页> 外文期刊>ACI Materials Journal >Compatibility of Shrinkage-Reducing and Air-Entraining Admixtures
【24h】

Compatibility of Shrinkage-Reducing and Air-Entraining Admixtures

机译:减缩剂和引气剂的相容性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The compatibility of two shrinkage-reducing admixtures (SRAs) with two air-entraining admixtures (AEAs)-one surfactant-based and one foaming polymer-based-was examined based on freezing-and-thawing durability, scaling resistance, and air-void characteristics of hardened concrete. SRA dosages of 0, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0% by weight of cement were used. Test results show that interactions between admixtures can reduce air-void stability, contributing to lowered freezing-and-thawing durability and scaling resistance. Without an SRA, concrete mixtures containing either AEA exhibited good freezing-and-thawing durability and scaling resistance. With an SRA, mixtures containing the surfactant-based AEA performed well, while those containing the polymer-based AEA did not. Mixtures containing higher dosages of SRA, regardless of AEA, experienced a greater loss in air content in concrete between the plastic and hardened conditions. Mixtures with an increased air-void spacing factor experienced decreased durability, with the greatest decrease observed in those with air-void spacing factors greater than 0.008 in. (0.20 mm).
机译:根据冻融耐久性,抗结垢性和无气孔性,研究了两种减缩剂(SRA)与两种引气剂(AEA)的相容性(一种基于表面活性剂和一种发泡聚合物)。硬化混凝土的特性。 SRA用量为水泥重量的0、0.5、1.0和2.0%。测试结果表明,混合物之间的相互作用会降低气孔稳定性,从而降低其冻融耐久性和抗结垢性。如果没有SRA,则包含两种AEA的混凝土混合物都具有良好的抗冻融性和抗结垢性。对于SRA,含有基于表面活性剂的AEA的混合物表现良好,而含有基于聚合物的AEA的混合物则表现不佳。不论AEA含量如何,含有较高SRA剂量的混合物在塑性和硬化条件之间的空气含量损失更大。空隙间隔因子增加的混合物的耐久性下降,在空隙间隔因子大于0.008英寸(0.20毫米)的混合物中观察到最大的减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号