首页> 外文期刊>Accreditation and Quality Assurance >Measurement of PAHs in environmental matrices: results from an interlaboratory comparison on the different steps of the measurement procedure
【24h】

Measurement of PAHs in environmental matrices: results from an interlaboratory comparison on the different steps of the measurement procedure

机译:环境基质中PAHs的测量:实验室之间对测量程序不同步骤的比较结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Proficiency testing (PT) is becoming a feature of laboratory accreditation and the PT results are used to assess the technical competence of the participating laboratories. ISPRA (former APAT) plays an important role in supporting the Italian laboratories belonging to the network of the Regional Environmental Agencies to improve the quality of their analytical measurements. As a consequence, ISPRA organized an interlaboratory comparison to assess the performance of the laboratories on PAH measurement procedure. The interlaboratory comparison was drawn separating the different steps of the measurement (from the extraction to the instrumental measurement). Two matrix reference materials: (1) a polluted soil and (2) an extract reference material of the same polluted soil and a “blind” PAH mixture standard stock solution were distributed to 59 Italian laboratories. The results of interlaboratory comparison showed a significant dispersion of the PAH measurements that masks the effects of the different extraction and cleanup procedures used, but it is consistent with the results of other European interlaboratory comparisons.
机译:能力验证(PT)成为实验室认可的一项功能,并且PT结果用于评估参与实验室的技术能力。 ISPRA(以前的APAT)在支持属于地区环境机构网络的意大利实验室以提高其分析测量质量方面发挥着重要作用。因此,ISPRA组织了实验室间的比较,以评估实验室在PAH测量程序方面的表现。进行了实验室间的比较,将测量的不同步骤分开(从提取到仪器测量)。两种基质参考物质:(1)受污染的土壤和(2)相同污染土壤的提取物参考物质和“盲” PAH混合标准储备溶液已分配给59个意大利实验室。实验室间比较的结果表明,PAH测量值的显着差异掩盖了所使用的不同提取和净化程序的影响,但这与其他欧洲实验室间比较的结果一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号