首页> 外文期刊>Accreditation and Quality Assurance >Target measurement uncertainty as a tool for validation of uncertainties estimated by different approaches: determination of total hardness in drinking and natural waters
【24h】

Target measurement uncertainty as a tool for validation of uncertainties estimated by different approaches: determination of total hardness in drinking and natural waters

机译:目标测量不确定度作为验证通过不同方法估算的不确定性的工具:确定饮用水和天然水中的总硬度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this work, a procedure for total hardness determination in drinking and natural waters, expressed by the equivalent mass concentration of CaCO3, ( gamma_{text{s}} ), using an in-house complexometric titration with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid based on standardized procedure was detailed. Compliance of the procedures requirements with legislation is discussed. Validation and quality control actions were implemented, and a limit of detection of 0.6 mg L−1 was determined fulfilling the target limit of detection of 15 mg L−1 imposed by specific legislation. Measurement precision was estimated under repeatability conditions, where relative standard deviations close to 1 % were estimated, and in within-laboratory reproducibility, where relative standard uncertainties of 4 % and 0.5 % were obtained for ( gamma_{text{s}} ) lower and higher than 100 mg L−1, respectively. The results were considered unbiased whenever recoveries were within the range 0.90–1.10, fulfilling the target trueness value stated as 10 % of parametric value. The performance of the measurement procedure was also assessed by proficiency testing and z scores less than 2 were obtained. Measurement uncertainty was estimated by a modeling approach, using the law of propagation of uncertainty for variables not independent, and by empirical ones, such as single-laboratory validation and quality control data and proficiency testing. Measurement uncertainty computed from each model was assessed by ξ score performance indicator showing a good estimated uncertainty (|ξ| < 2). Finally, a way is proposed to assess the suitability of the combined uncertainty by the different models, comparing them to a target expanded measurement uncertainty within the analytical range, calculated from maximum decreed precision and trueness criteria since no target uncertainties were stated in the legislation.
机译:在这项工作中,根据标准程序,使用乙二胺四乙酸进行室内络合滴定,确定了饮用水和天然水中总硬度的程序,以当量CaCO3的质量浓度表示(gamma_ {text {s}})。详细。讨论了程序要求与法规的符合性。实施了验证和质量控制措施,确定了0.6 mg L-1的检出限,以满足特定法规规定的15 mg L-1的检出限。在重复性条件下估计测量精度,其中相对标准偏差估计接近1%,在实验室内可重复性下,较低(gamma_ {text {s}})的相对标准不确定度分别为4%和0.5%。分别高于100 mg L-1只要回收率在0.90-1.10范围内,满足目标真实性值(表示为参数值的10%),就认为结果没有偏见。还通过能力测试评估了测量程序的性能,并获得了小于2的z得分。测量不确定度是通过一种建模方法,使用不确定变量的不确定性传播定律以及非实验室变量,单实验室验证和质量控制数据以及能力验证等经验变量来估计的。由ξ得分性能指标评估从每个模型计算出的测量不确定度,该得分显示出良好的估计不确定度(|ξ| 2)。最后,提出了一种方法来评估不同模型对组合不确定度的适用性,将它们与分析范围内的目标扩展测量不确定度进行比较,该范围由最大法度精度和真实性标准计算得出,因为立法中未规定目标不确定度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号