首页> 外文期刊>Accounting and finance >Do brokers' recommendation changes generate brokerage? Evidence from a central limit order market
【24h】

Do brokers' recommendation changes generate brokerage? Evidence from a central limit order market

机译:经纪人的建议变更会产生经纪人吗?来自中央限价订单市场的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We examine the short-term response to recommendation changes on the Australian Securities Exchange, a central limit order market. In both central limit order markets and dealer-driven markets, clients may reward the recommending broker with increased trade volumes. But a central limit order market does not have mandatory market makers and hence provides greater opportunity to free ride. We find evidence supporting the hypothesis that recommending brokers are rewarded with higher trade volumes and brokerage commission. Consistent with the tipping hypothesis, these rewards are concentrated in the period shortly before the release. There is no evidence of free riding.
机译:我们研究了澳大利亚证券交易所(一个中央限价订单市场)对推荐变更的短期反应。在中央限价订单市场和经销商驱动的市场中,客户都可以通过增加交易量来奖励推荐经纪人。但是中央限价委托单市场没有强制性的做市商,因此提供了更多的搭便车机会。我们发现证据支持以下假设,即推荐经纪人会获得更高的交易量和经纪人佣金。与小费假设一致,这些报酬集中在发布前不久的时期。没有迹象表明可以搭便车。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号