首页> 外文期刊>Accountancy >REDUNDANCY SELECTION AND AGE DISCRIMINATION
【24h】

REDUNDANCY SELECTION AND AGE DISCRIMINATION

机译:冗余选择和年龄区分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Court of Appeal has confirmed in Rolls-Royce plc v Unite the Union that the use of length of service as a criterion for redundancy selection is not unlawful where it is used as part of a selection matrix and it can be shown to be justified. Rolls-Royce had asked for a declaration that the use of length of service as one of the redundancy selection criteria discriminated against younger members of the workforce who had less opportunity to accrue length of service, and was therefore unlawful under the age regulations. Unite the Union had disputed the application, as it wanted Rolls-Royce to continue to apply the selection criteria as set out in their collective agreement.
机译:上诉法院在罗尔斯·罗伊斯公司(Rolls-Royce plc)对联合会(United Union)的判决中确认,将服务时长用作冗余选择的标准在将其用作选择矩阵的一部分时是非法的,并且可以证明是合理的。罗尔斯·罗伊斯(Rolls-Royce)要求作出声明,将服务年限作为裁员选择标准之一,歧视了年轻人职人员,因为他们没有机会增加服务年限,因此根据年龄规定是非法的。联合工会对申请提出异议,因为它希望劳斯莱斯继续采用其集体协议中规定的甄选标准。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Accountancy》 |2009年第1391期|79-79|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号