首页> 外文期刊>Accountancy >DESIGN AND BUILD RECHARGES
【24h】

DESIGN AND BUILD RECHARGES

机译:设计和内置充电

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Community Housing Association Limited tribunal decision has been appealed successfully to the High Court. This related to a design and build structure carried out by a housing association, where the housing association initially incurred standard-rated professional costs, but set up a subsidiary design and build company and then recharged those costs to it. It sought recovery of VAT, which HM Revenue & Customs denied on the basis that the cost had actually been incurred by the housing association, not for onward charge to the subsidiary company, and therefore that this constituted exempt input tax. The tribunal had accepted that analysis, thereby appearing to create an immutable rule that once an organisation had incurred input tax for a given purpose, it could not change that purpose simply by making a recharge to a related company.
机译:社区住房协会有限公司法庭的裁决已成功上诉至高等法院。这与房屋协会执行的设计和建造结构有关,房屋协会最初承担标准评级的专业费用,但成立了附属设计和建造公司,然后将这些费用记入其中。它要求追回增值税,英国税务与海关总署拒绝了增值税,理由是该费用实际上是房屋协会产生的,而不是向子公司收取的费用,因此,这构成了免征进项税。仲裁庭已经接受了这种分析,因此似乎制定了一个不变的规则,即组织一旦为给定目的缴纳了进项税,就不能仅仅通过向关联公司充值来改变该目的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Accountancy》 |2009年第1389期|76-76|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号