首页> 外文期刊>Accountancy >POOR POLITICS
【24h】

POOR POLITICS

机译:政治不佳

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although I am one of eight independent members of the Treasury tax professionals forum, I am not currently a tax partner in a Big Four firm. But as I was for over 13 years, I am able to comment on the Public Accounts Committee's (PAC) report. Almost all senior corporate executives and tax advisers I have spoken to about this ongoing debate have been appalled by the blend of misinformation and accusation provided to the public, often promulgated by those who should know better. The public deserves better communication about tax issues, free from innuendo. I will suggest a way forward but it is necessary to dispel some myths. First, I have known many tax professionals (Big Four and others) whom have been seconded to the Treasury (HMT) or HMRC over the years. I have always been impressed how diligently and independently they carry out their assignments and, in particular, their care in maintaining the appropriate level of confidentiality required.
机译:尽管我是美国国库税收专业人士论坛的八个独立成员之一,但我目前不是四大公司的税务合伙人。但是,与我过去13年的时间一样,我能够对公共帐目委员会(PAC)的报告发表评论。我与这场持续辩论所交谈的几乎所有高级企业高管和税务顾问都对向公众提供的错误信息和指责相结合而感到震惊,这些信息通常是由本应该更了解的人颁布的。公众应就税收问题进行更好的沟通,而不受影射。我将提出一个前进的道路,但有必要消除一些神话。首先,我认识许多年来一直借调到美国财政部(HMT)或英国税务与海关总署(HMRC)的税务专业人士(四大会计师事务所等)。他们总是以勤奋和独立的态度执行任务,尤其是他们在保持所需的适当保密级别上的照顾,给我留下了深刻的印象。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Accountancy》 |2013年第1438期|41-41|共1页
  • 作者

    Stephen Herring;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号