首页> 外文期刊>Accountancy >PROTECTING THE WHISTLEBLOWER
【24h】

PROTECTING THE WHISTLEBLOWER

机译:保护告密者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

On 21 May 2014, the UK Supreme Court handed down its judgment in Clyde & Co LLP and another v Bates Van Winkelhof. While the case involved a law firm, this significant decision will affect all limited liability partnerships (LLPs) and extends protection against retaliation from whistleblowing to hundreds of members of accountancy firms. The Supreme Court held that members of LLPs can be 'workers' for the purposes of the whistleblower legislation. This ruling chimed with the underlying purposes of the whistleblowing rules. The protection that employees already enjoy is now extended to partners in the event that they blow the whistle on unlawful conduct. So, if a partner blows the whistle on work-related matters and then suffers reprisals as a result, including being expelled from the LLP, they will have a right of recourse.
机译:2014年5月21日,英国最高法院在Clyde&Co LLP案和另一项Bates Van Winkelhof案中宣判。虽然此案涉及一家律师事务所,但这一重大决定将影响所有有限责任合伙企业(LLP),并将防止举报的保护范围扩大到数百家会计师事务所的成员。最高法院认为,就举报人立法而言,有限合伙人的成员可以是“工人”。该裁定与举报规则的基本目的相吻合。如果员工因违法行为而吹口哨,员工已经享有的保护现在将扩展到合作伙伴。因此,如果合伙人在与工作有关的事情上吹口哨,然后因此受到报复,包括被开除在有限责任合伙企业中,他们将拥有追索权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号