...
首页> 外文期刊>Accountancy >COURT OF APPEAL RULES ON SPLITTING COSTS FOR ECLIPSE TRIBUNAL
【24h】

COURT OF APPEAL RULES ON SPLITTING COSTS FOR ECLIPSE TRIBUNAL

机译:月结法庭上的分摊费用上诉规则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The promoters of a film partnership tax avoidance scheme, who lost their case against HMRC, now face paying the costs of preparing the paperwork involved following a ruling by the Court of Appeal, Eclipse Film Partners No. 35 LLP v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2014] EWCA Civ 184. The latest judgment concerns Eclipse Film Partners which had challenged HMRC in both the FTT and the Upper Tribunal over its scheme involving the acquisition and exploitation of film rights to provide tax relief for investors, losing on both occasions. The Eclipse case was allocated as a so-called 'complex case', giving the tribunal the power to make an order for costs at the end of the appeal. However, Eclipse opted out of the costs-shifting rules.
机译:电影合作伙伴避税计划的发起人在针对HMRC的诉讼中败诉,但在上诉法院,Eclipse Film Partners第35号LLP诉收入和海关关员[2014年]作出裁决后,现在面临支付准备文书工作的费用。 EWCA Civ 184.最近的判决涉及Eclipse电影合作伙伴,后者在FTT和上法庭对HMRC提出质疑,涉及其收购和利用电影版权为投资者提供税收减免的计划,但均败诉。 Eclipse案件被分配为所谓的“复杂案件”,使法庭有权在上诉结束时下达命令。但是,Eclipse选择退出成本转移规则。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Accountancy》 |2014年第1449期|29-31|共3页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号