首页> 外文期刊>Accident Analysis & Prevention >Use of speed profile as surrogate measure: Effect of traffic calming devices on crosstown road safety performance
【24h】

Use of speed profile as surrogate measure: Effect of traffic calming devices on crosstown road safety performance

机译:使用速度曲线作为替代措施:交通减速装置对跨镇道路安全性能的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Urban road safety management is usually characterized by the lack of sufficient, good quality crash data and low budgets to obtain it even though many traffic accidents occur there. For example, 54 percent of road crashes in Spain take place in urban areas, and 10 percent of urban fatal crashes occur on crosstown roads, which are rural roads that traverse small communities. Traffic calming measures (TCMs) are often implemented on these parts of rural roads that traverse small communities in order to reduce both the frequency and severity of crashes by lowering speeds, but evaluation of their effectiveness has been limited. The objective of this study was to develop a methodology using continuous speed profiles to evaluate the safety effectiveness of TCMs on crosstown roads as part of an integrated system in the absence of historical data. Given the strong relationship between speed and crash experience, safety performance can be related to speed. Consequently, speed can be used indirectly as a surrogate safety measure in the absence of crash and speed data. Two indexes were defined in this study as surrogate safety measures based on the continuous speed profile: Ra and Ea. Ra represents the absolute accumulated speed variations relative to the average speed and is inversely related to accumulated speed uniformity; and Ea represents the accumulated speed variations above the speed limit and is directly related to accumulated speeding. Naturalistic data were collected using GPS trackers for 12 scenarios with different TCM spacings. Then, the indexes were applied to individual observed speed profiles (individual analysis) as well as the operating speed profile (global analysis). The values obtained from individual and global analysis were statistically different. Spacing lower than 110 m, which was found optimal from previous research, did not allow drivers to modify their speeds as the accumulated speed uniformity was quite similar regardless of the average operating speed; and, accumulated speeding was also minimized. Consequently, the scenarios where the TCMs were implemented according to the technical criteria presented a better design quality. On the other hand, age and gender differences did not seem to affect the average speeds or the accumulated speed uniformity and accumulated speeding.
机译:城市道路安全管理的特点通常是,尽管那里发生了许多交通事故,但仍缺乏足够的,高质量的事故数据,并且缺乏获得该事故的预算。例如,西班牙54%的道路交通事故发生在城市地区,而10%的城市致命交通事故发生在跨镇道路(穿越小社区的农村道路)上。通常在穿越小社区的乡村道路的这些部分实施交通管制措施(TCM),以通过降低速度来减少交通事故的频率和严重程度,但是对其有效性的评估受到限制。这项研究的目的是开发一种使用连续速度曲线的方法,以评估在没有历史数据的情况下作为集成系统一部分的中城道路上中药的安全有效性。鉴于速度和碰撞体验之间的密切关系,安全性能可能与速度有关。因此,在没有碰撞和速度数据的情况下,速度可以间接用作替代安全措施。在本研究中,基于连续速度曲线定义了两个指标作为替代安全措施:Ra和Ea。 Ra表示相对于平均速度的绝对累积速度变化,并且与累积速度均匀性成反比; Ea表示速度极限以上的累积速度变化,与累积速度直接相关。使用GPS追踪器收集了12种具有不同TCM间隔的场景的自然数据。然后,将指标应用于各个观察到的速度曲线(单独分析)以及操作速度曲线(全局分析)。从个体分析和整体分析获得的值在统计上是不同的。低于110 m的间距(根据先前的研究发现是最佳的)不允许驾驶员更改其速度,因为无论平均运行速度如何,累积的速度均匀性都非常相似。并且,累积的速度也被最小化。因此,根据技术标准实施TCM的方案具有更好的设计质量。另一方面,年龄和性别差异似乎并未影响平均速度或累积速度均匀性和累积超速。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号