首页> 外文期刊>Accident Analysis & Prevention >Corrigendum to: 'Publication bias and time-trend bias in meta-analysis of bicycle helmet efficacy: A re-analysis of Attewell, Glase and McFadden, 2001' [Accid. Anal. Prev. 43 (2011) 1245-1251]
【24h】

Corrigendum to: 'Publication bias and time-trend bias in meta-analysis of bicycle helmet efficacy: A re-analysis of Attewell, Glase and McFadden, 2001' [Accid. Anal. Prev. 43 (2011) 1245-1251]

机译:更正为:“自行车头盔功效的荟萃分析中的出版物偏倚和时间趋势偏倚:对Attewell,Glase和McFadden的重新分析,2001” [Accid。肛门上一个43(2011)1245-1251]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper is a corrigendum to the previously published paper: "Publication bias and time-trend bias in meta-analysis of bicycle helmet efficacy: A re-analysis of Attewell, Glase and McFadden, 2001" [Accid. Anal. Prev. (2011) 1245-1251]. This corrigendum was prepared to correct errors in data and analysis in the previously published paper. Like the previously published paper, this paper confirms that the meta-analysis of bicycle helmet efficacy reported by Attewell, Glase and McFadden (Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2001, 345-352) was influenced by publication bias and time-trend bias that was not controlled for. As a result, the analysis reported inflated estimates of the effects of bicycle helmets. This paper presents a re-analysis of the study. The re-analysis included: (1) Ensuring the inclusion of all published studies by means of continuity corrections of estimates of effect relying on zero counts; (2) detecting and adjusting for publication bias by means of the trim-and-fill method; (3) detecting and trying to account for a time-trend bias in estimates of the effects of bicycle helmets; (4) updating the study by including recently published studies evaluating the effects of bicycle helmets. The re-analysis shows smaller safety benefits associated with the use of bicycle helmets than the original study.
机译:本文是对以前发表的论文的勘误:“自行车头盔功效的荟萃分析中的出版偏倚和时间趋势偏倚:对Attewell,Glase和McFadden的再分析,2001” [Accid。肛门上一个(2011)1245-1251]。准备该勘误是为了纠正先前发表的论文中的数据和分析错误。像以前发表的论文一样,该论文也证实了Attewell,Glase和McFadden(Accident Analysis and Prevention,2001,345-352)报告的自行车头盔功效的荟萃分析受出版偏倚和时间趋势偏倚的影响,而这种偏倚并未受到控制。结果,该分析报告了对自行车头盔影响的高估。本文对研究进行了重新分析。重新分析包括:(1)通过依靠零计数对效应估计值进行连续校正来确保包括所有已发表的研究; (2)通过修整和填充方法检测和调整出版偏差; (3)在评估自行车头盔的影响时发现并尝试考虑时间趋势偏差; (4)通过包括最近发表的评估自行车头盔效果的研究来更新研究。与原始研究相比,重新分析显示,与使用自行车头盔相关的安全性收益更小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号