首页> 外文期刊>Accident Analysis & Prevention >System theory and safety models in Swedish, UK, Dutch and Australian road safety strategies
【24h】

System theory and safety models in Swedish, UK, Dutch and Australian road safety strategies

机译:瑞典,英国,荷兰和澳大利亚的道路安全策略中的系统理论和安全模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Road safety strategies represent interventions on a complex social technical system level. An understanding of a theoretical basis and description is required for strategies to be structured and developed. Road safety strategies are described as systems, but have not been related to the theory, principles and basis by which systems have been developed and analysed. Recently, road safety strategies, which have been employed for many years in different countries, have moved to a 'vision zero', or 'safe system style. The aim of this study was to analyse the successful Swedish, United Kingdom and Dutch road safety strategies against the older, and newer, Australian road safety strategies, with respect to their foundations in system theory and safety models. Analysis of the strategies against these foundations could indicate potential improvements. The content of four modern cases of road safety strategy was compared against each other, reviewed against scientific systems theory and reviewed against types of safety model. The strategies contained substantial similarities, but were different in terms of fundamental constructs and principles, with limited theoretical basis. The results indicate that the modern strategies do not include essential aspects of systems theory that describe relationships and interdependencies between key components. The description of these strategies as systems is therefore not well founded and deserves further development.
机译:道路安全策略代表了在复杂的社会技术系统层面上的干预措施。需要对理论基础和描述进行理解,才能构建和开发策略。道路安全策略被描述为系统,但与开发和分析系统的理论,原理和基础无关。最近,在不同国家/地区已使用多年的道路安全策略已转变为“零视力”或“安全系统风格”。这项研究的目的是就系统理论和安全模型的基础,针对较旧和较新的澳大利亚道路安全策略,分析成功的瑞典,英国和荷兰道路安全策略。针对这些基础的策略分析可能表明存在潜在的改进。比较了四个现代道路安全策略案例的内容,对照科学系统理论进行了回顾,并针对安全模型的类型进行了回顾。这些策略具有实质性的相似性,但是在基本结构和原理方面有所不同,并且理论基础有限。结果表明,现代策略不包括描述关键组件之间的关系和相互依赖性的系统理论的基本方面。因此,将这些策略作为系统的描述尚不完善,值得进一步发展。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Accident Analysis & Prevention》 |2015年第1期|271-278|共8页
  • 作者

    B.P. Hughes; A. Anund; T.Falkmer;

  • 作者单位

    School of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia;

    Swedish Road and Transport Research Institute, 581 95 Linkoeping, Sweden;

    School of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia ,Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences (IMH), Faculty of Health Sciences, Linkoeping University and Pain and Rehabilitation Centre, UHL, County Council, Linkoeping, Sweden ,School of Occupational Therapy, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC., Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Crash; Factor; Road safety; Strategy; System;

    机译:崩溃;因子;道路交通安全;战略;系统;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号