首页> 外文期刊>Accident Analysis & Prevention >Risk factors for unsafe events involving a motor vehicle for group riders (cyclists): A naturalistic case-crossover study
【24h】

Risk factors for unsafe events involving a motor vehicle for group riders (cyclists): A naturalistic case-crossover study

机译:涉及集团骑手机动车的不安全事件的危险因素(骑自行车者):自然主义案例交叉研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study aimed to determine the risk factors associated with unsafe events involving a motor vehicle, that occurred while group riding (cycling) in Perth, Western Australia. Naturalistic video footage was collected from 52 group riders and unsafe events identified. A case-crossover study was used to compare the road infrastructure and group behavioural characteristics of 108 case sites where unsafe events occurred to 216 control sites where no unsafe events occurred. After controlling for potential confounding factors, round abouts increased the risk of an unsafe event compared to midblocks (odds ratio (OR): 3.63, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.57-8.42, p = 0.003), priority control intersections (OR: 4.36, 95% CI: 1.49-12.76, 0.007) and traffic signal intersections (OR: 5.57, 95% CI: 1.42-21.79, p = 0.014). Raised traffic islands (OR: 2.30, 95% CI: 1.41-3.78, p = 0.001), posted speed limits of = 60 km per hour (OR: 2.45, 95% CI: 1.55-3.86, p 0.001) and group rider traffic violations (OR: 2.51, 95% CI: 1.14-5.53, p = 0.022) also significantly increased the risk of an unsafe event. Riding two abreast in the traffic lane (OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.32-0.76, p = 0.002) or having all riders in the bicycle lane (OR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.04-0.51, p = 0.003), significantly reduced the risk of an unsafe event, compared to riding single file in the traffic lane. Simple road infrastructure treatments on popular group riding routes as well as education targeting both group riders and motorists, could reduce unsafe events and promote a safer, more inclusive shared road environment for group riders.
机译:本研究旨在确定与涉及机动车辆的不安全事件相关的风险因素,而在珀斯,西澳大利亚珀斯骑行(骑自行车)。从52个小组骑手和不安全事件中收集了自然主义视频镜头。案例交叉研究用于比较108个案例网站的道路基础设施和群体行为特征,其中不安全事件发生在216个控​​制站点,其中没有不安全事件发生。在控制潜在的混淆因素后,与中间块相比增加了不安全事件的风险(赔率比(或):3.63,95%置信区间(CI):1.57-8.42,P = 0.003),优先控制交叉口(或:4.36,95%CI:1.49-12.76,0007)和交通信号交叉口(或:5.57,95%CI:1.42-21.79,P = 0.014)。凸起的交通岛(或:2.30,95%CI:1.41-3.78,P = 0.001),速度限制> = 60 km /小时(或:2.45,95%CI:1.55-3.86,P <0.001)和组骑手交通违规(或:2.51,95%CI:1.14-5.53,P = 0.022)也显着增加了不安全事件的风险。在交通车道中骑两种?(或:0.50,95%:0.32-0.76,p = 0.002)或在自行车道中拥有所有骑士(或:0.14,95%CI:0.04-0.51,P = 0.003),与乘坐单一文件在交通通道中的单个文件相比,显着降低了不安全事件的风险。简单的道路基础设施对流行群岛骑行路线以及针对团体车手和驾驶者的教育,可以减少不安全的事件,并为集团骑手推广更安全,更包容的共用道路环境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号