首页> 外文期刊>Accident Analysis & Prevention >Are long-haul truck drivers unusually alert? A comparison with long-haul airline pilots
【24h】

Are long-haul truck drivers unusually alert? A comparison with long-haul airline pilots

机译:是长途卡车司机异常警报吗?与长途航空公司飞行员的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Recent studies suggest heavy vehicle drivers self-estimate their sleepiness unexpectedly low during night duties. The present study compared sleepiness ratings of long-haul truck drivers with those of long-haul airline pilots during night and non-night duties. In addition, the correspondence between self-rated manifest and predicted latent sleepiness was examined in the two groups.Methods: Twenty-two drivers and 33 pilots participated. Their working hours, sleep, on-duty sleepiness, and use of sleepiness countermeasures were measured in naturalistic conditions. Predictions of latent sleepiness were based on the measurements of working hours and sleep using the Sleep/Wake Predictor modelling tool.Results: Drivers rated lower levels of sleepiness than pilots during both duty types, though predicted latent sleepiness levels were very similar among the two groups. Neither the results of sleep nor those of sleepiness countermeasures explained the difference in self-rated sleepiness.Discussion: The results raise the possibility that long-haul truck drivers are actually sleepier than they report, and thus are at an increased risk for not responding to sleepiness in a timely manner. A potential explanation for this behavior is lack of education and training on sleepiness among truck drivers as compared with airline pilots. Alternatively, long-haul truck drivers may be exceptionally tolerant to soporific working conditions. The first reported results do not, however, support this hypothesis.
机译:背景:最近的研究表明,在夜间职责期间,重型车辆司机在夜间职务期间出乎意料地自我估计。本研究与夜间和非夜间职责相比,长途卡车司机的嗜睡额度与长途航空公司飞行员的睡眠评级相比。此外,在两组中检查了自额定清单和预测的潜在嗜睡之间的对应。方法:二十二个司机和33名飞行员参加。他们的工作时间,睡眠,值班嗜睡以及嗜睡对策的使用是在自然主义条件下进行的。潜伏嗜睡的预测是基于工作时间和睡眠的测量,使用睡眠/唤醒预测仪建模工具。结果:驾驶员在两个占空比期间的飞行员率较低,但这两组之间的预测潜在嗜睡水平非常相似。睡眠结果和嗜睡对策都不解释了自我评价的睡眠差异。探讨:结果提高了长途卡车司机实际上比他们报告的可能性,因此没有响应的风险增加及时睡觉。与航空公司飞行员相比,对这种行为的潜在解释是缺乏卡车司机睡眠的教育和训练。或者,长途车辆驾驶员可能对不合适的工作条件特别耐受。然而,第一个报告的结果并没有支持这一假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号